Back

Modeling individual variability in habitat selection and movement using integrated step-selection analyses

Chatterjee, N.; Wolfson, D.; Kim, D.; Gomez, J. V.; Freeman, S.; Bacheler, N. M.; Shertzer, K.; Taylor, C.; Fieberg, J.

2023-08-16 ecology
10.1101/2023.07.31.551213 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1. Integrated step-selection analyses (ISSAs) are frequently used to study habitat selection using animal movement data. Methods for incorporating random effects in ISSAs have been developed, making it possible to quantify variability among animals in their space-use patterns. Although it is possible to model variability in both habitat selection and movement parameters, applications to date have focused on the former despite the widely acknowledged and important role that movement plays in determining ecological processes from the individual to ecosystem level. One potential explanation for this omission is the absence of readily-available software or examples demonstrating methods for estimating movement parameters in ISSAs with random effects. 2. We demonstrated methods for characterizing among-individual variability in both movement and habitat-selection parameters using a simulated data set and by fitting two models to an acoustic telemetry data set containing locations of 35 red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus). Movement kernels were assumed to depend on either the type of benthic reef habitat in which the fish was located (model 1) or the distance between the fishs current location and nearest edge habitat (model 2). In both models, we also quantified habitat selection for different benthic habitat classes and distance to edge habitat, and we allowed for individual variability in movement and habitat-selection parameters using random effects. 3. The simulation example highlights the benefits of a mixed effects specification, namely we can increase precision when estimating individual-specific movement parameters by borrowing information across like individuals. In our applied example, we found substantial among-individual variability in both habitat selection and movement parameters. Nonetheless, most red snapper selected for hardbottom habitat and for locations nearer to edge habitat. They also moved less when in hardbottom habitat. Turn angles were frequently near {+/-}{pi}, but were more dispersed when fish were far away from edge habitat. 4. We provide code templates and functions for quantifying variability in movement and habitat-selection parameters when implementing ISSAs with random effects. In doing so, we hope to encourage ecologists conducting ISSAs to take full advantage of their ability to model among-individual variability in both habitat-selection and movement patterns.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.9%
3
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
5
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
8
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
11
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
19
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%