Jointly modeling deep mutational scans identifies shifted mutational effects among SARS-CoV-2 spike homologs
Haddox, H. K.; Galloway, J. G.; Dadonaite, B.; Bloom, J. D.; Matsen, F. A.; DeWitt, W. S.
Show abstract
Deep mutational scanning (DMS) is a high-throughput experimental technique that measures the effects of thousands of mutations to a protein. These experiments can be performed on multiple homologs of a protein or on the same protein selected under multiple conditions. It is often of biological interest to identify mutations with shifted effects across homologs or conditions. However, it is challenging to determine if observed shifts arise from biological signal or experimental noise. Here, we describe a method for jointly inferring mutational effects across multiple DMS experiments while also identifying mutations that have shifted in their effects among experiments. A key aspect of our method is to regularize the inferred shifts, so that they are nonzero only when strongly supported by the data. We apply this method to DMS experiments that measure how mutations to spike proteins from SARS-CoV-2 variants (Delta, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.2) affect cell entry. Most mutational effects are conserved between these spike homologs, but a fraction have markedly shifted. We experimentally validate a subset of the mutations inferred to have shifted effects, and confirm differences of >1,000-fold in the impact of the same mutation on spike-mediated viral infection across spikes from different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Overall, our work establishes a general approach for comparing sets of DMS experiments to identify biologically important shifts in mutational effects. Significance StatementAmino-acid mutations to a protein have effects that can shift as the protein evolves or is put under new selective pressure. The effects of amino-acid mutations to a specific protein under a defined selective pressure can be measured by deep mutational scanning experiments. Here, we devise an approach to quantify shifts in mutational effects between experiments performed on different homologs (i.e. variants) of the same protein, or on the same protein selected under different conditions. We use this approach to compare experiments performed on three homologs of SARS-CoV-2 spike, identifying mutations that have shifted in their effect on spike-mediated viral infection by >1,000 fold across SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The simplicity of protein sequence-function relationships 97%
- Understanding epistatic networks in the B1 -lactamases through coevolutionary statistical modeling and deep mutational scanning 96%
- Inherent instability of simple DNA repeats shapes an evolutionarily stable distribution of repeat lengths 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epistasis facilitates functional evolution in an ancient transcription factor 97%
- The landscape of antibody binding affinity in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 evolution 95%
- Deep mutational scanning and machine learning reveal structural and molecular rules governing allosteric hotspots in homologous proteins 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.