Potential to Enhance Large Scale Molecular Assessments of Skin Photoaging through Virtual Inference of Spatial Transcriptomics from Routine Staining
Srinivasan, G.; Davis, M.; LeBoeuf, M.; Fatemi, M.; Azher, Z.; Lu, Y.; Diallo, A.; Montivero, M.; Kolling, F.; Perrard, L.; Salas, L.; Christensen, B.; Palisoul, S.; Tsongalis, G.; Vaickus, L.; Preum, S.; Levy, J.
Show abstract
The advent of spatial transcriptomics technologies has heralded a renaissance in research to advance our understanding of the spatial cellular and transcriptional heterogeneity within tissues. Spatial transcriptomics allows investigation of the interplay between cells, molecular pathways and the surrounding tissue architecture and can help elucidate developmental trajectories, disease pathogenesis, and various niches in the tumor microenvironment. Photoaging is the histological and molecular skin damage resulting from chronic/acute sun exposure and is a major risk factor for skin cancer. Spatial transcriptomics technologies hold promise for improving the reliability of evaluating photoaging and developing new therapeutics. Current challenges, including limited focus on dermal elastosis variations and reliance on self-reported measures, can introduce subjectivity and inconsistency. Spatial transcriptomics offer an opportunity to assess photoaging objectively and reproducibly in studies of carcinogenesis and discern the effectiveness of therapies that intervene on photoaging and prevent cancer. Evaluation of distinct histological architectures using highly-multiplexed spatial technologies can identify specific cell lineages that have been understudied due to their location beyond the depth of UV penetration. However, the cost and inter-patient variability using state-of-the-art assays such as the 10x Genomics Spatial Transcriptomics assays limits the scope and scale of large-scale molecular epidemiologic studies. Here, we investigate the inference of spatial transcriptomics information from routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) tissue slides. We employed the Visium CytAssist spatial transcriptomics assay to analyze over 18,000 genes at a 50-micron resolution for four patients from a cohort of 261 skin specimens collected adjacent to surgical resection sites for basal and squamous keratinocyte tumors. The spatial transcriptomics data was co-registered with 40x resolution whole slide imaging (WSI) information. We developed machine learning models that achieved a macro-averaged median AUC and F1 score of 0.80 and 0.61 and Spearman coefficient of 0.60 in inferring transcriptomic profiles across the slides, and accurately captured biological pathways across various tissue architectures.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial Transcriptomics Inferred from Pathology Whole-Slide Images Links Tumor Heterogeneity to Survival in Breast and Lung Cancer 92%
- Efficient prediction of a spatial transcriptomics profile better characterizes breast cancer tissue sections without costly experimentation 92%
- Generating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models: a multifaceted approach to evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computer Vision Identifies Recurrent and Non-Recurrent Ductal Carcinoma in situ Lesions with Special Emphasis on African American Women 91%
- Graph perceiver network for lung tumor and bronchial premalignant lesion stratification from histopathology 91%
- Non-Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes Have Distinct Morphology and Immunophenotype in Obese Breast Cancer patients at Risk for Metastasis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cellular-level phenotyping of tumor-immune microenvironment (TiME) in patients in vivo reveals distinct inflammation and endothelial anergy signatures 94%
- ROSIE: AI generation of multiplex immunofluorescence staining from histopathology images 94%
- Imputing Single-Cell Protein Abundance in Multiplex Tissue Imaging 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.