Back

Centrosome amplification primes for apoptosis and favors the response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer beyond multipolar divisions

Edwards, F.; Fantozzi, G.; Simon, A. Y.; Morretton, J.-P.; Herbette, A.; Tijhuis, A. E.; Wardenaar, R.; Foulane, S.; Gemble, S.; Spierings, D. C. J.; Foijer, F.; Mariani, O.; Vincent-Salomon, A.; Roman-Roman, S.; Sastre-Garau, X.; Goundiam, O.; Basto, R.

2023-07-29 cell biology
10.1101/2023.07.28.550973 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Centrosome amplification is a feature of cancer cells associated with chromosome instability and invasiveness. Enhancing chromosome instability and subsequent cancer cell death via centrosome unclustering and multipolar divisions is an aimed-for therapeutic approach. Here we show that centrosome amplification favors responses to conventional chemotherapy independently of multipolar divisions and chromosome instability. We perform single-cell live imaging of chemotherapy responses in epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines and observe increased cell death when centrosome amplification is induced. By correlating cell fate with mitotic behaviors, we show that enhanced cell death occurs independently of chromosome instability. We identify that cells with centrosome amplification are primed for apoptosis. We show they are dependent on the apoptotic inhibitor BCL-XL, and that this is not a consequence of mitotic stresses associated with centrosome amplification. Given the multiple mechanisms that promote chemotherapy responses in cells with centrosome amplification, we assess such a relationship in an epithelial ovarian cancer patient cohort. We show that high centrosome numbers associate with improved chemotherapy responses and longer overall survival. Our work identifies apoptotic priming as a clinically relevant consequence of centrosome amplification, expanding our understanding of this pleiotropic cancer cell feature.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.