Coordination of gaze and action during high-speed steering and obstacle avoidance
Powell, N.; Marshall, X.; Diaz, G. J.; Fajen, B. R.
Show abstract
When humans navigate through complex environments, they coordinate gaze and steering to efficiently sample the visual information needed to guide movement. Gaze and steering behavior during high-speed self-motion has been extensively studied in the context of automobile driving along a winding road. Theoretical accounts that have emerged from this work capture behavior during movement along explicit, well-defined paths over flat, obstacle-free ground surfaces. However, humans are also capable of visually guiding self-motion over uneven terrain that is cluttered with obstacles and may lack an explicit path. An extreme example of such behavior occurs during first-person view drone racing, in which pilots maneuver at high speeds through a dense forest. In this study, we explored the gaze and steering behavior of skilled drone pilots. Subjects guided a simulated quadcopter along a racecourse embedded within a forest-like virtual environment built in Unity. The environment was viewed through a head-mounted display while gaze behavior was recorded using an eye tracker. In two experiments, subjects performed the task in multiple conditions that varied in terms of the presence of obstacles (trees), waypoints (hoops to fly through), and a path to follow. We found that subjects often looked in the general direction of things that they wanted to steer toward, but gaze fell on nearby objects and surfaces more often than on the actual path or hoops. Nevertheless, subjects were able to perform the task successfully, steering at high speeds while remaining on the path, passing through hoops, and avoiding collisions. Furthermore, in conditions that contained hoops, subjects adapted how they approached the most immediate hoop in anticipation of the position (but not the orientation) of the subsequent hoop. Taken together, these findings challenge existing models of steering that assume that steering is tightly coupled to where actors look.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world visual search goes beyond eye movements: Active searchers select 3D scene viewpoints too 96%
- Eye-head coordination and dynamic visual scanning as indicators of visuo-cognitive demands in driving simulator 94%
- Influence of open-source virtual-reality based gaze training on navigation performance in Retinitis pigmentosa patients in a crossover randomized controlled trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive posture stabilization before contact with moving objects: equivalence of smooth pursuit tracking and peripheral vision 95%
- Risk optimization during ongoing movement: Insights from movement and gaze behavior in throwing 95%
- Predictive steering: Integration of artificial motor signals in self-motion estimation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.