More than just density: the role of egg number, food volume and container dimensions in mediating larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster
Venkitachalam, S.; V.S., S.; Joshi, A.
Show abstract
Flies of the genus Drosophila have been extensively used as model systems to study competition. Experiments using larval crowding in these species have furthered our understanding of competition ecology, stress-adaptation, density-dependent selection and population dynamics. Historically, larval competition has been induced by crowding the larvae in high density cultures, compared to low-density controls. However, recent studies have shown that two larval cultures having the same total eggs per mL food density, with different absolute quantities of eggs and food, can differ greatly in their density-specific fitness functions. Similarly, populations adapted to two types of cultures achieving the same density through different means, can also evolve different traits. Thus, it is clear that there is more to larval crowding than just eggs/food density, which has until now been the benchmark variable for quantifying larval crowding in Drosophila studies. In the current study, we explore the consequences of implementing crowding in different ways, using a three-way factorial experiment with egg number and food volume, cast into different food column heights or cylindrical vials with different diameters. We find that not just the same density, but cultures having the same egg number and food volume combination but experienced in food columns of varying height and diameter can have very different pre-adult survivorship and development times. We further propose a new variable for quantifying larval crowding - effective density, which is the density within the larval feeding band, a volume of food close to the surface, with access to air, wherein a majority of the larvae feed. We show that effective density is a much better predictor of the outcomes of competition than the popularly used total eggs/food density.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional differences between the two host strains of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) 95%
- How do invasion syndromes evolve? An experimental evolution approach using the ladybird Harmonia axyridis 94%
- Experimental evolution of virulence and associated traits in a Drosophila melanogaster - Wolbachia symbiosis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolution of a novel female reproductive strategy in Drosophila melanogaster populations subjected to long term protein restriction 95%
- Pure species discriminate against hybrids in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup 94%
- Testing the adaptive value of sporulation in budding yeast using experimental evolution 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Density-by-diet interactions during larval development shape adult life-history trait expression and fitness in a polyphagous fly 95%
- Intergenerational Effects of Early Life Starvation on Life-History, Consumption, and Transcriptome of a Holometabolous Insect 95%
- Temperature-dependent competitive outcomes between the fruit flies Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Timing of increased temperature sensitivity coincides with nervous system development in winter moth embryos 93%
- Temperature outweighs diet in shaping developmental performance in two cricket species via growth delays and physiological limits 93%
- Social foraging extends associative odor-food memory expression in an automated learning assay for Drosophila melanogaster 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.