Mechanical Hand Synergies during Dynamic Hand Movements are Mostly Controlled in a Non-Synergistic Way by Spinal Motor Neurons
Osswald, M.; Cakici, A. L.; Braun, D. I.; Souza de Oliveira, D.; Del Vecchio, A.
Show abstract
Precise control of spinal motor neurons is crucial for voluntary hand and digit movements. However, the specific mechanisms by which motor unit ensembles govern dynamic synergistic and individual digit tasks remain poorly understood. We recorded synchronized 3D hand kinematics and high-density surface EMG (HD-sEMG) data from extrinsic hand muscles of twelve participants during 13 dynamic hand and digit movement tasks, consisting of single-digit flexion/extension and mechanically synergistic grasping tasks. We extracted single motor unit (MU) activity and identified identical MUs across tasks. We extracted 7.8 {+/-} 1.8 MUs per task and participant and found 182 out of 554 total MUs active during multiple movements. Analysis of the MU discharge patterns revealed two groups of motor units that were categorized into prime mover MUs, showing strong correlation between firing rate modulation and digit kinematics, and postural MUs with little modulated activity. We found these motor units could switch between the two modes, showing either postural or movement encoding activation depending on the task. However, MUs acted as prime mover only for one specific digit. We further observed highly task specific recruitment of prime mover MUs. Across participants, we found only 9 {+/-} 8.2 % of prime mover MUs active during a grasp task and any single digit task involved in the grasp motion. We draw three conclusions: (1) Single digits are controlled by distinct groups of MUs. (2) Unexpectedly, mechanically synergistic grasp movements are mostly controlled in a non-synergistic way by distinct groups of MUs. 3) Multiple manifolds construct the movement of the human hand, and each motor unit can flexibly switch between postural and dynamic modes. Significance StatementWe investigated the neural control of motor unit ensembles during single-digit and synergistic grasping tasks in dynamic conditions. We found that motor units exhibited strong movement-correlated activity only for one specific digit. We further observed highly task specific recruitment of motor units during mechanically synergistic grasp movements, showing that on a motor unit level, mechanically synergistic movements are controlled in a non-synergistic way. The findings extend the knowledge of motor unit recruitment strategies in natural movements and have strong implications in the field of neurorehabilitation and control of assistive devices.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The identification of extensive samples of motor units in human muscles reveals diverse effects of neuromodulatory inputs on the rate coding 96%
- Distinct population code for movement kinematics and changes of ongoing movements in human subthalamic nucleus 95%
- I-Spin live: An open-source software based on blind-source separation for real-time decoding of motor unit activity in humans 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Larger and denser: an optimal design for surface grids of EMG electrodes to identify greater and more representative samples of motor units 96%
- Neural filtering of physiological tremor oscillations to spinal motor neurons mediates short-term acquisition of a skill learning task 96%
- Variations in clustering of multielectrode local field potentials in the motor cortex of macaque monkeys during a reach-and-grasp task 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying alterations in hand movement coordination from chronic stroke survivors using a wearable high-density EMG sleeve 96%
- Detecting single motor-unit activity in magnetomyography 95%
- Irregularity of instantaneous gamma frequency in the motor control network characterize visuomotor and proprioceptive information processing 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.