Patterns of speciation in a parapatric pair of Saturnia moths as revealed by Target Capture
Khan, M.; Joshi, M.; Espeland, M.; Huemer, P.; Vaamonde, C. L.; Mutanen, M.
Show abstract
The focus of this study is to understand the evolutionary relationships and taxonomy of widely distributed parapatric species pair of wild silk moths, Saturnia pavonia and Saturnia pavoniella (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Europe. To address species delimitation challenges associated with many parapatric taxa, target enrichment and mtDNA sequencing was employed alongside phylogenetic, species delimitation, admixture and introgression analyses. The dataset included individuals from both species, two hybrids generated in the lab, as well as individuals from outside the contact zone. Nuclear markers strongly supported both S. pavonia and S. pavoniella as two distinct species, with the hybrids grouping together as intermediate and separate from both species. However, the maximum likelihood (ML) tree generated from mtDNA sequencing data presented a different picture, showing both taxa to be phylogenetically intermixed. This inconsistency may be attributed to mitonuclear discordance, which can arise from biological factors (e.g., introgressive hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting) or alternatively operational factors (e.g., incorrect species delimitation). We further provide the evidence of past introgression to have taken place, but no evidence of current admixture between the two species. Finally, we discuss our results from evolutionary point of view taking into consideration the past climatic oscillations that has likely shaped the present dynamics between the species. Overall, this study demonstrated the effectiveness of the target enrichment approach in resolving the phylogenetic relationships between closely related parapatric species and providing insights into their taxonomic delimitation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Local adaptation fuels cryptic speciation in terrestrial annelids 97%
- Evolving in the darkness: phylogenomics of Sinocyclocheilus cavefishes highlights recent diversification and cryptic diversity 97%
- Gene flow in phylogenomics: Sequence capture resolves species limits and biogeography of Afromontane forest endemic frogs from the Cameroon Highlands 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-genome analysis of multiple wood ant population pairs supports similar speciation histories, but different degrees of gene flow, across their European range 96%
- Phylogenomics unravels speciation patterns in temperate-montane plant species: a case study on the recently radiating Ranunculus auricomus species complex 96%
- The worldwide invasion history of a pest ambrosia beetle inferred using population genomics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary history of an Alpine archaeognath(Machilis pallida) - insights from different variant types 96%
- Species limits and hybridization in Andean leaf-eared mice (Phyllotis) 96%
- Low-coverage reduced representation sequencing reveals subtle within-island genetic structure in Aldabra giant tortoises 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic sex determination in three closely related hydrothermal vent gastropods, including one species with intersex individuals 95%
- Temporal genomics help in deciphering neutral and adaptive patterns in the contemporary evolution of kelp populations 94%
- A comparison of methodological approaches to the study of young sex chromosomes: A case study in Poecilia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- New approaches to species delimitation and population structure of corals: two case studies using ultraconserved elements and exons 97%
- Italian Odonates in the Pandora's Box: A Comprehensive DNA Barcoding Inventory Shows Taxonomic Warnings at the Holarctic Scale 95%
- Phylogeographic model selection using convolutional neural networks 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.