A genome wide association study to identify germline variants associated with cancer-associated cachexia - a preliminary analysis
Narasimhan, A.; Kumaran, M.; Gioulbasanis, I.; Skipworth, R. J. E.; Bathe, O.; Kaasa, S.; Strasser, F.; Gagnon, B.; Baracos, V. E.; Damaraju, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundCancer cachexia is characterized by severe loss of muscle and fat involving a complex interplay of host-tumor interactions. While much emphasis has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms associated with cachexia, understanding the heritable component of cachexia remains less explored. The current study aims to identify Copy Number Variants (CNV) as genetic susceptibility determinants for weight loss in patients with cancer cachexia using genome wide association study (GWAS) approach. MethodsA total of 174 age-matched patients with esophagogastric or lung cancer were classified as weight losing (>10% weight loss) or weight stable participants (<2% weight loss). DNA was genotyped using Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays to profile CNVs. We tested CNVs with >5% frequency in the population for association with weight loss. Pathway analysis was performed using the genes embedded within CNVs. To understand if the CNVs in the present study are also expressed in skeletal muscle of patients with cachexia, we utilized two publicly available human gene expression datasets to infer the relevance of identified genes in the context of cachexia. ResultsAmong the associated CNVs, 5414 CNVs had embedded protein coding genes. Of these, 1583 CNVs were present at >5% frequency. We combined multiple contiguous CNVs within the same genomic region and called them Copy Number Variable Region (CNVR). This led to identifying 896 non-redundant CNV/CNVRs which encompassed 803 protein coding genes. Genes embedded within CNVs were enriched for several pathways implicated in cachexia and muscle wasting including JAK-STAT signaling, Oncostatin M signaling, Wnt signaling and PI3K-Akt signaling. This is the first proof of principle GWAS study to identify CNVs as genetic determinants for cancer cachexia. Further, we show that a subset of CNV/CNVR embedded genes identified in the current study are common with the previously published skeletal muscle gene expression datasets, indicating that expression of CNV/CNVR genes in muscle may have functional consequences in patients with cachexia These genes include CPT1B, SPON1, LOXL1, NFAT5, RBFOX1 and PCSK6 to name a few. ConclusionThis is the first proof of principle GWAS study to identify CNVs as genetic determinants for cancer cachexia. The data generated will aid in future replication studies in larger cohorts to account for genetic susceptibility to weight loss in patients with cancer cachexia.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of uncoupling protein one genetic polymorphisms and their relationship with cardiovascular and metabolic health 93%
- Investigation of clinical characteristics and genome associations in the ‘UK Lipoedema’ cohort 92%
- Novel candidates of pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a 3,552 Japanese whole-genome sequence dataset (3.5KJPNv2) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting interleukin-1 for reversing fat browning and muscle wasting in infantile nephropathic cystinosis 93%
- Late-Stage Skeletal Muscle Transcriptome in Duchenne muscular dystrophy shows a BMP4-Induced Molecular Signature 93%
- Cholesterol metabolism is a potential therapeutic target in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing sensitivity and coverage of clinical WGS as a diagnostic test for genetic disorders 90%
- \"Mitochondrial GWAS and Association of Nuclear - Mitochondrial Epistasis with BMI in T1DM Patients\" 90%
- Clinically relevant combined effect of polygenic background, rare pathogenic germline variants, and family history on colorectal cancer incidence 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.