Back

Comparison of the analytical and clinical sensitivity of thirty-four rapid antigen tests with the most prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK

Byrne, R. L.; Aljayyoussi, G.; Greenland - Bews, C.; Kontogianni, K.; Wooding, D.; Williams, C. T.; de Vos, M.; Body, R.; Adams, E. R.; Escadafel, C.; Edwards, T. R.; Cubas Atienzar, A. I.

2023-07-24 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.07.24.23293072 medRxiv
Show abstract

Antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have become a central pillar for the management of COVID-19 worldwide due to their speed and ease of use, and are now being developed for use in other emerging outbreaks. Like other viruses, SARS-CoV-2 is subject to rapid mutation as it spreads, and new Variants of Concern (VOCs) emerge frequently, posing a significant challenge for the reliability of Ag-RDTs designed against the original strain to detect newer, highly mutated variants. It is therefore important that the performance of Ag-RDTs is regularly evaluated, particularly in outbreak scenarios where rapid diagnostics are key to limiting disease spread. Here, we present a comprehensive evaluation of the analytical and clinical sensitivity of 34 commercially available Ag-RDTs with five VOCs, all of which were highly prevalent in the UK at various times between 2019 and 2023. This evaluation highlights the importance of regular evaluation of Ag-RDT performance, with several Ag-RDTs demonstrating reduced performance with some VOCs. This study also highlights the challenges that arise when different organisations lack a consensus approval threshold, causing confusion over Ag-RDT performance and making it difficult to properly evaluate individual tests. We conclude that regular performance evaluation through our proposed pipeline combined with a broad consensus approval threshold across global organisations is essential to maintaining the effectiveness of Ag-RDTs as a disease management tool during outbreaks. ImportanceAntigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) came to global prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic, where they offered a quick and simple at home diagnostic which could be used to manage disease spread. A major ongoing challenge for the broad use of Ag-RDTs is the speed at which new SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge, each of which has the potential to reduce the performance of the available Ag-RDTs. As Ag-RDTs are explored for use in other viral disease outbreaks, pipelines for the regular evaluation of test performance are essential for ensuring that Ag-RDTs can be employed effectively. Here, we have developed a robust pipeline for the large-scale evaluation of commercially available Ag-RDTs against several major SARS-CoV-2 variants, which can be adapted and applied to other emerging outbreaks to ensure test performance is maintained as a virus evolves.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.