Back

The role of rivers as geographical barriers in shaping genetic differentiation and diversity of Neotropical primates

Helenbrook, W. D.; Valdez, J.

2023-07-25 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.07.23.550208 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We quantitatively tested the riverine barrier hypothesis and its influence on biogeographical distributions and molecular variation in New World monkeys (Parvorder: Platyrrhini). Using mitochondrial markers (cytochrome oxidase subunit II and cytochrome b), we analyzed taxonomic differences and the effects of geographical barriers on molecular patterns across Central and South America. Nearly 80% of described species are separated by geographical barriers. River width exhibited a positive correlation with molecular dissimilarity in adjacent taxa for both molecular markers. Streamflow also showed a positive association, although not statistically significant, likely due to limited sample size. Several presently described taxa were not supported based solely on these molecular phylogenetic markers, including Saimiri, Mico, Cebus, Sapajus, and Cherecebus. These taxonomic issues are far more common where river barriers do not exist. In conclusion, we found a significant correlation between river width and molecular divergence in adjacent taxa, indicating that wider rivers were associated with greater molecular dissimilarity for two commonly used mitochondrial genes. Species boundaries were predominantly found at river interfaces, and in the absence of discernable geological barriers, adjoining species were more likely to exhibit molecular similarity. Our findings suggest that both river and mountain barriers significantly restrict gene flow for the majority of neotropical taxa, with geological formation of river barriers coinciding with estimated speciation events. Additionally, river width proves to be a valuable tool for estimating molecular divergence in adjacent taxa, particularly in regions with limited sampling.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
3
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.6%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
8
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
10
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
12
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Primates
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
17
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
21
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Freshwater Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%