Back

Salmonella impairs macrophage immunity through effector-independent rapid translational induction in response to membrane puncture by the SPI-1 injectisome

Wood, G.; Powell, J.; Johnson, R.; Lastovka, F.; Bryant, O.; Brember, M.; Tourlomousis, P.; Carr, J.; Bryant, C.; Chung, B. Y.

2024-01-09 molecular biology
10.1101/2023.07.21.550113 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During bacterial infection both the host cell and its invader must divert intracellular resources to synthesise specific proteins in a timely manner. For the host, these factors may be needed for innate immune responses, including programmed cell death, and in the bacteria newly synthesized proteins may be survival factors needed to counteract host responses. Salmonella is an important food-borne bacterial pathogen that invades and multiplies within host cells. It is well established that invasion of epithelial cells is dependent upon the SPI-1 Type III injectisome, a biological needle that penetrates and secretes effectors into host cells to promote internalization. However, the importance of the SPI-1 injectisome in infection of professional phagocytes such as macrophages, which are the predominant host cell type during systemic infection, is less clear. Through time resolved parallel transcriptomic and translatomic studies of macrophage infection, we revealed that SPI-1 injectisome-dependent infection of macrophages triggers rapid translation of transcription factor mRNAs, including Early Growth Response 1 (Egr1). Despite the short half-life of EGR1 protein, its swift synthesis within the initial hour of infection is sufficient to inhibit transcription of pro-inflammatory genes and thereby restrain inflammatory responses and programmed cell death within the first hour of during early infection. This transient period of inflammatory suppression in macrophages is exploited by Salmonella to establish infection and sheds new insight on the importance of translational activation in host-pathogen dynamics during Salmonella infection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.