Evidence of an optimal error rate for motor skill learning
Al-Fawakhiri, N.; Kayani, S.; McDougle, S. D.
Show abstract
When acquiring a motor skill, learners must practice the skill at a difficulty that is challenging but still manageable to gradually improve their performance. In other words, during training, the learner must experience success as well as failure. Does there exist an optimal proportion of successes and failures to promote the fastest improvements in skill? Here, we build on a recent theoretical framework for optimal machine learning, extending it to the learning of motor skills. We then designed a custom task whose difficulty dynamically changed along with human subjects performance, constraining the error rate during training. In a large behavioral dataset (N=192), we observed evidence that learning is greatest at around a [~]30% error rate, matching our theoretical predictions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Did we get sensorimotor adaptation wrong? Implicit adaptation as direct policy updating rather than forward-model-based learning 98%
- Incorporation of a cost of deliberation time in perceptual decision making 97%
- Motor sequence learning involves better prediction of the next action andoptimization of movement trajectories 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.