Back

Simulation of gap junction formation reveals critical role of cysteines in connexon coupling

Heja, L.; Simon, A.; Kardos, J.

2023-07-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.07.19.549697 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the fundamental functions of connexin gap junctions (CxGJs), understanding of molecular mechanisms, governing intercellular CxGJ formation by coupling of connexon hemichannels (CxHCs, connexons) is still in infancy. In silico simulation of intercellular connexon coupling of two Cx43HC models, embedded in membrane bilayers (Cx43HC-HC) successfully modelled the emergence of trans-gap junctional (trans-GJ) stabilization centers (SCs). Investigating the molecular determinants shaping the HC-HC interface, we revealed that the exceptionally high number of cysteine residues located at the interface play a pivotal role in the stabilization of HC and GJ structures. Opening of the disulphide bonds between these cysteines resulted in disappearance of trans-GJ SCs in the Cx43GJ model. In contrast, the Cx43HC form was found to be consistent with open disulphide bonds. Finally, we have shown that the presence of an adjoining HC contributes to disulphide formation and consequently to the emergence of trans-GJ H-bonds. Our results suggest that several connexon channels in vertebrates may undertake intercellular connexon coupling similarly and may bring forward to the targeting of CxGJ-specific coupling.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
15.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.3%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
● 140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.3%
7
Structure
○ 193 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
8
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.2%
9
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.2%
10
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
11
Nature Computational Science
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
15
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Chemical Science
● 73 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
19
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
● 67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
21
JACS Au
● 43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
22
Journal of General Physiology
● 60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
25
National Science Review
◐ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.