Back

Mu-opioid receptor-dependent changes in social reward across adolescence in mice

Harda, Z.; Klimczak, M.; Misiolek, K.; Chroszcz, M.; Szumiec, L.; Jarosz, M. K.; Rygula, R.; Ziolkowska, B.; Parkitna, J. R.

2023-08-09 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.07.19.549691 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleSocial behaviors undergo dramatic changes during adolescence, enabling the development of adult social abilities. These changes are intricately linked to the development of the brain reward system and the activity of endogenous opioid signaling. However, the involvement of the opioid system in the development of social behaviors still raises more questions than answers. ObjectivesHere, we investigated the role of the endogenous opioid system in the rewarding effects of social contact in early and late adolescent male mice. MethodsSocial reward was assessed using the social conditioned place preference task in early adolescent (~34 days old) and late adolescent (~41 days old) male mice that received a single dose of the selective opioid receptor antagonists cyprodime (1 mg/kg, i.p.), naltrindole (1 mg/kg, i.p.) or norbinaltorphimine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) before the preference posttest. ResultsThe administration of cyprodime or naltrindole before the posttest significantly increased the preference for the social-conditioned context in early but not late adolescent mice. In contrast, pretreatment with norbinaltorphimine had no effect on context preference. ConclusionsOur findings support a modified version of the state-dependent mu-opioid receptor model of social behavior, where the effects of opioid ligands are not reversed during development but rather weaken or disappear with age. Furthermore, the results indicate that interactions with siblings in early adolescent mice are motivated by negative reinforcement, whereas those in late adolescence are motivated by positive reinforcement.

Published in Psychopharmacology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.