Age and Task Modulate Olfactory Sensitivity in the Florida Carpenter Ant Camponotus floridanus
Ferguson, S. T.; Bakis, I.; Edwards, N. D.; Zwiebel, L. J.
Show abstract
Age-related changes in behavior and sensory perception have been observed in a wide variety of animal species. In ants and other eusocial insects, workers often progress through an ordered sequence of olfactory-driven behavioral tasks. Notably, these behaviors are plastic, and workers adapt and rapidly switch tasks in response to changing environmental conditions. In the Florida carpenter ant, smaller minors typically perform most of the work needed to maintain the colony while the larger majors are specialized for nest defense and rarely engage in these routine tasks. Here, we investigate the effects of age and task group on olfactory responses to a series of odorant blends in minor and major worker castes. Consistent with their respective roles within the colony, we observed significant age-associated shifts in the olfactory responses of minors as they transitioned between behavioral states, whereas the responses of majors remained consistently low regardless of age. Furthermore, we identified a unitary compound, 3-methylindole, which elicited significantly higher responses and behavioral aversion in minor nurses than in similarly aged foragers suggesting that this compound may play an important role in brood care. Taken together, our results suggest that age- and task-associated shifts in olfactory physiology may play a critical role in the social organization of ant colonies. Simple SummaryFlorida carpenter ants (Camponotus floridanus) live in colonies comprised of thousands of workers. The smallest workers, known as minors, engage in routine tasks such as nursing and foraging while the largest workers, known as majors, are thought to be soldiers specialized for defending the nest. How ant colonies allocate their workforce to address the dynamic and ever-changing needs of the colonies remains an open question in the field, but current evidence suggests that ant social behavior likely results from a combination of genetic/epigenetic, physiological, and systems-level processes. Here, we extend these studies by investigating the role of olfactory sensitivity in regulating ant behavior. Minor workers exhibited significant shifts in olfactory sensitivity and odor coding as they aged and switched tasks. The olfactory sensitivity of majors, however, remained relatively stable as they aged. From these studies, we also identified a single compound, 3-methylindole, which elicited significantly higher olfactory responses and aversive behavior in nurses compared to foragers, suggesting that this chemical may have a role in brood care. Overall, these studies support the hypothesis that changes in olfactory sensitivity play an important role in regulating social behavior in ants.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Avoiding pitfalls: Trace conditioning and rapid aversive learning during route navigation in desert ants 92%
- Multisensory integration in Anopheles mosquito swarms: The role of visual and acoustic information in mate tracking and collision avoidance 91%
- Unconventional cell division cycles from marine-derived yeasts 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Odor Coding of Nestmate Recognition in the Eusocial Ant Camponotus floridanus 95%
- Loss of wings induces the expression of the worker-like phenotype in queens of a ponerine ant 94%
- Impacts and mechanisms of CO2 narcosis in bumble bees: Narcosis depends on dose, caste and mating status and is not induced by anoxia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Antennal sensilla diversity in diurnal and nocturnal fireflies (Coleoptera, Lampyridae) 94%
- Western red cedar (Thuja plicata) beehives have no impact on honey bee (Apis mellifera) overwintering colony survival or detoxification enzyme expression 94%
- Novelty detection in early olfactory processing of the honey bee, Apis mellifera 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.