A signalling rheostat controls chromosome segregation fidelity during early lineage specification and neurogenesis by modulating DNA replication stress
de Jaime Soguero, A.; Hattemer, J.; Haas, A.; Bufe, A.; Di Marco, B.; Bohly, N.; Landry, J. J. M.; Schoell, B.; Rosa, V. S.; Villacorta, L.; Baskan, Y.; Androulaki, S.; Trapp, M.; Benes, V.; Das, B.; Shahbazi, M.; Jauch, A.; Engel, U.; Patrizi, A.; Sotillo, R.; Bageritz, J.; Alfonso, J.; Bastians, H.; Acebron, S. P.
Show abstract
The development and homeostasis of organisms rely on the correct replication, maintenance and segregation of their genetic blueprints. How these intracellular processes are monitored across generations of different human cellular lineages, and why the spatio-temporal distribution of mosaicism varies during development remain unknown. Here, we identify several lineage specification signals that regulate chromosome segregation fidelity in both human and mouse pluripotent stem cells. Through epistatic analyses, we find that that WNT, BMP and FGF form a signalling "rheostat" upstream of ATM that monitors replication fork velocity, origin firing and DNA damage during S-phase in pluripotency, which in turn controls spindle polymerisation dynamics and faithful chromosome segregation in the following mitosis. Cell signalling control of chromosome segregation fidelity declines together with ATM activity after pluripotency exit and specification into the three human germ layers, or further differentiation into meso- and endoderm lineages, but re-emerges during neuronal lineage specification. In particular, we reveal that a tug-of-war between FGF and WNT signalling in neural progenitor cells results in DNA damage and chromosome missegregation during cortical neurogenesis, which could provide a rationale for the high levels of mosaicism in the human brain. Our results highlight a moonlighting role of morphogens, patterning signals and growth factors in genome maintenance during pluripotency and lineage specification, which could have important implications for our understanding on how mutations and aneuploidy arise during human development and disease. One sentence summaryDevelopmental signals link genome maintenance to cell fate
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of PRC2 subunits primes lineage choice during exit of pluripotency 98%
- The deubiquitinase Usp9x regulates PRC2-mediated chromatin reprogramming during mouse development 98%
- The chromatin, topological and regulatory properties of pluripotency-associated poised enhancers are conserved in vivo 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The nuclear periphery confers repression on H3K9me2-marked genes and transposons to shape cell fate 97%
- Mechano-osmotic signals control chromatin state and fate transitions in pluripotent stem cells 97%
- Modelling co-development between somites and neural tube with human Trunk-like Structures (hTLS) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute multi-level response to defective de novo chromatin assembly in S-phase 96%
- Enhancer-promoter interactions are reconfigured through the formation of long-range multiway chromatin hubs as mouse ES cells exit pluripotency 96%
- TRIM24 directs replicative stress responses to maintain ALT telomeres via chromatin signaling 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- TASOR expression in naive embryonic stem cells safeguards their developmental potential 97%
- Identification of Novel Modulators of the ALT Pathway Through a Native FISH-Based Optical Screen 96%
- DROSHA, DICER and Damage-Induced long ncRNA control BMI1-dependent transcriptional repression at DNA double-strand break 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Directed differentiation of functional corticospinal-like neurons from endogenous SOX6+/NG2+ cortical progenitors 96%
- MicroRNA-eQTLs in the developing human neocortex link miR-4707-3p expression to brain size 95%
- TGFβ signalling is required to maintain pluripotency of human naïve pluripotent stem cells 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.