Back

Estimating the gap between clinical cholera and true community infections: findings from an integrated surveillance study in an endemic region of Bangladesh

Hegde, S.; Khan, A. I.; Perez-Saez, J.; Khan, I. I.; Dent Hulse, J.; Islam, M. T.; Khan, Z. H.; Ahmed, S.; Bertuna, T.; Rashid, M.; Rashid, R.; Hossain, M. Z.; Shirin, T.; Wiens, K. E.; Gurley, E. S.; Bhuiyan, T. R.; Qadri, F.; Azman, A. S.

2023-07-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.07.18.23292836 medRxiv
Show abstract

Our understanding of cholera transmission and burden largely rely on clinic-based surveillance, which can obscure trends, bias burden estimates and limit the impact of targeted cholera-prevention measures. Serologic surveillance provides a complementary approach to monitoring infections, though the link between serologically-derived infections and medically-attended disease - shaped by immunological, behavioral, and clinical factors - remains poorly understood. We unravel this cascade in a cholera-endemic Bangladeshi community by integrating clinic-based surveillance, healthcare seeking, and longitudinal serological data through statistical modeling. We found >50% of the study population had a V. cholerae O1 infection annually, and infection timing was not consistently correlated with reported cases. Four in 2,340 infections resulted in symptoms, only one of which was reported through the surveillance system. These results provide new insights into cholera transmission dynamics and burden in the epicenter of the 7th cholera pandemic and provide a framework to synthesize serological and clinical surveillance data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.