Back

Worldwide trends in COVID-19 related attacks against healthcare

Duffhues, W.; Barten, D.; De Cauwer, H.; Mortelmans, L.; van Osch, F.; Tin, D.; Koopmans, M.; Ciottone, G.

2023-07-23 emergency medicine
10.1101/2023.07.18.23292819 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, violence targeting healthcare reportedly increased. Attacks against healthcare have the potential to impair the public health response and threaten the availability of healthcare services. However, there is little systematic understanding of the extent and characteristics of healthcare attacks in the setting of a pandemic. This study aimed to investigate global trends regarding COVID-19 related attacks against healthcare from January 2020 until January 2023. MethodologyCOVID-19 related incidents that occurred between January 2020 and January 2023 were extracted from the Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition database and screened for eligibility. Data collected per incident included temporal factors; country; setting; attack and weapon type; perpetrator; motive; number of healthcare workers (HCWs) and patients killed, injured or kidnapped; and whether the incident caused damage to a health facility. ResultsThis study identified 255 COVID-19 related attacks against healthcare. The attacks occurred globally and throughout the course of the pandemic. Incidents were heterogeneous with regards to motives, attack types and outcomes. At least 18 HCWs were killed, 147 HCWs were injured and 86 facilities were damaged or destroyed. There were two periods with a peak incidence of reports. The first peak occurred during the beginning of the pandemic, and predominantly concerned stigma-related attacks against healthcare. The second peak, in 2021, was mainly composed of conflict-related attacks in Myanmar, and attacks targeting the global vaccination campaign. ConclusionCOVID-19 related attacks against healthcare occurred globally and in a variety of settings throughout the course of the pandemic. The findings of this study can be used to prevent and mitigate healthcare attacks during the ongoing and future pandemics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.4%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
7
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
9
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
15
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%