The SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeler constrains enhancer activity during Drosophila wing development
Niederhuber, M. J.; Leatham-Jensen, M.; McKay, D. J.
Show abstract
Chromatin remodeling is central to the dynamic changes in gene expression that drive cell fate determination. During development, the sets of enhancers that are accessible for use change globally as cells transition between stages. While transcription factors and nucleosome remodeling complexes are known to work together to control access to enhancers, it is unclear how the short stretches of DNA that they individually unmask yield the kilobase-sized accessible regions that are characteristic of active enhancers. Here, we performed a genetic screen to investigate the role of ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes in the control of dynamic enhancer activity. We find that the Drosophila BAP complex, a member of the SWI/SNF family of nucleosome remodelers, is required for repression of a temporally dynamic enhancer, brdisc. Contrary to expectations, we find that the BAP-specific subunit, Osa, is dispensable for mediating changes in chromatin accessibility between early and late stages of wing development. Instead, we find that Osa is required to constrain the levels of brdisc activity in imaginal wing discs when the enhancer is normally active. Genome-wide profiling reveals that Osa binds directly to the brdisc enhancer as well as thousands of other developmentally dynamic regulatory sites, including multiple genes encoding components and targets of the Notch signaling pathway. We find that Osa loss of function results in development of ectopic sensory structures that are normally patterned by Notch signaling early in wing development. Moreover, we find that Osa loss of function results in hyperactivation of the Delta gene, which encodes the Notch ligand. Together, these findings indicate that proper constraint of enhancer activity is necessary for regulation of dose-dependent developmental events.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rif1 functions in a tissue-specific manner to control replication timing through its PP1-binding motif 97%
- Catalytic activity of the Bin3/MEPCE methyltransferase domain is dispensable for 7SK snRNP function in Drosophila melanogaster 96%
- A genetic toolkit for studying transposon control in the Drosophila melanogaster ovary 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NDNF-like factor Nord is a Hedgehog-induced extracellular BMP modulator that regulates Drosophila wing patterning and growth 97%
- Scaling between cell cycle duration and wing growth is regulated by Fat-Dachsous signaling in Drosophila 97%
- GAF is essential for zygotic genome activation and chromatin accessibility in the early Drosophila embryo 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regenerative growth is constrained by brain tumor to ensure proper patterning in Drosophila 96%
- Local chromatin context dictates the genetic determinants of the heterochromatin spreading reaction 95%
- A Van Gogh/Vangl tyrosine phosphorylation switch regulates its interaction with core Planar Cell Polarity factors Prickle and Dishevelled 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pathogenic variants in CRX have distinct cis-regulatory effects on enhancers and silencers in photoreceptors 95%
- Trajectory Mapping of the Early Drosophila Germline Reveals Controls of Zygotic Activation and Sex Determination 95%
- Cell type- and chromosome-specific chromatin landscapes and DNA replication programs of Drosophila testis tumor stem-cell like cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Genetic Screen Links the Disease-Associated Nab2 RNA-Binding Protein to the Planar Cell Polarity Pathway in Drosophila melanogaster 95%
- A mutation in the Drosophila melanogaster eve stripe 2 minimal enhancer is buffered by flanking sequences 95%
- Spatial and temporal control of expression with light-gated LOV-LexA 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.