Back

Climate and geography shape hybrid zone dynamics across space and time: insights from Populus trichocarpa x P. balsamifera

Bolte, C. E.; Phannareth, T.; Fitzpatrick, M. C.; Holliday, J.; Keller, S. R.; Hamilton, J. A.

2023-07-19 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.07.17.549358 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Population demographic changes, alongside landscape, geographic, and climate heterogeneity, can influence the timing, stability, and extent of introgression where species hybridize. Thus, quantifying interactions across diverged lineages, and the relative contributions of interspecific genetic exchange and selection to divergence at the genome-wide level is needed to better understand the drivers of hybrid zone formation and maintenance. We used seven latitudinally arrayed transects to quantify the contributions of climate, geography, and landscape features to broad patterns of genetic structure across the hybrid zone of Populus trichocarpa and P. balsamifera and evaluated the demographic context of hybridization over time. We found genetic structure differed among the seven transects. While ancestry was structured by climate, landscape features influenced gene flow dynamics. Demographic models indicated a secondary contact event may have influenced contemporary hybrid zone formation with the origin of a putative hybrid lineage that inhabits regions with higher aridity than either of the ancestral groups. Phylogenetic relationships based on chloroplast genomes support the origin of this hybrid lineage inferred from demographic models based on nuclear data. Our results point towards the importance of climate and landscape patterns in structuring the contact zones between P. trichocarpa and P. balsamifera and emphasize the value whole genome sequencing can have to advancing our understanding of how neutral processes influence divergence across space and time.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.