Back

Ubiquitination-mediated Golgi-to-endosome sorting determines the toxin-antidote duality of wtf meiotic drivers

Zheng, J.-X.; Du, T.-Y.; Shao, G.-C.; Ma, Z.-H.; Jiang, Z.-D.; Hu, W.; Suo, F.; He, W.; Dong, M.-Q.; Du, L.-L.

2023-11-06 cell biology
10.1101/2023.07.15.549172 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Killer meiotic drivers (KMDs) skew allele transmission in their favor by killing meiotic progeny not inheriting the driver allele. Despite their widespread presence in eukaryotes, the molecular mechanisms behind their selfish behavior are poorly understood. Here we investigate how the toxin and antidote products of a fission yeast wtf-family KMD gene can act antagonistically. Both the toxin and the antidote are multi-transmembrane proteins, differing only in their N-terminal cytosolic tails. We find that the antidote employs N-terminal PY motifs (Leu/Pro-Pro-X-Tyr) to bind Rsp5/NEDD4 family ubiquitin ligases, which ubiquitinate the antidote. Mutating PY motifs or attaching a deubiquitinating enzyme transforms the antidote into a toxic protein. Ubiquitination promotes the transport of the antidote from the trans-Golgi network to the endosome, thereby preventing it from causing toxicity. A physical interaction between the antidote and the toxin enables the ubiquitinated antidote to translocate the toxin to the endosome and neutralize its toxicity. We propose that post-translational modification-mediated protein localization and/or activity changes may be a common mechanism governing the antagonistic duality of single-gene KMDs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.