Popshift: A Thermodynamically Sound Approach To Estimate Binding Free Energies By Accounting For Ligand-Induced Population Shifts From A Ligand-Free Msm
Smith, L. G.; Novak, B.; Osato, M.; Mobley, D. L.; Bowman, G. R.
Show abstract
Obtaining accurate binding free energies from in silico screens has been a longstanding goal for the computational chemistry community. However, accuracy and computational cost are at odds with one another, limiting the utility of methods that perform this type of calculation. Many methods achieve massive scale by explicitly or implicitly assuming that the target protein adopts a single structure, or undergoes limited fluctuations around that structure, to minimize computational cost. Others simulate each protein-ligand complex of interest, accepting lower throughput in exchange for better predictions of binding affinities. Here, we present the PopShift framework for accounting for the ensemble of structures a protein adopts and their relative probabilities. Protein degrees of freedom are enumerated once, and then arbitrarily many molecules can be screened against this ensemble. Specifically, we use Markov state models (MSMs) as a compressed representation of a proteins thermodynamic ensemble. We start with a ligand-free MSM and then calculate how addition of a ligand shifts the populations of each protein conformational state based on the strength of the interaction between that protein conformation and the ligand. In this work we use docking to estimate the affinity between a given protein structure and ligand, but any estimator of binding affinities could be used in the PopShift framework. We test PopShift on the classic benchmark pocket T4 Lysozyme L99A. We find that PopShift is more accurate than common strategies, such as docking to a single structure and traditional ensemble docking--producing results that compare favorably with alchemical binding free energy calculations in terms of RMSE but not correlation--and may have a more favorable computational cost profile in some applications. In addition to predicting binding free energies and ligand poses, PopShift also provides insight into how the probability of different protein structures is shifted upon addition of various concentrations of ligand, providing a platform for predicting affinities and allosteric effects of ligand binding. Therefore, we expect PopShift will be valuable for hit finding and for providing insight into phenomena like allostery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Coevolution-driven method for efficiently simulating conformational changes in proteins reveals molecular details of ligand effects in the beta2AR receptor 97%
- Analysis of the dynamics of a complex, multipathway reaction: Insulin dimer dissociation 96%
- Computational Analysis of Energy Landscapes Reveals Dynamic Features that Contribute to Binding of Inhibitors to CFTR-Associated Ligand 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Binding site plasticity regulation of the FimH catch-bond mechanism 97%
- Exploring the Free Energy Landscape and Thermodynamics of Protein-Protein AssociationAssociation: HIV-1 Integrase Multimerization Induced by an Allosteric Inhibitor 96%
- Effect of Histidine Covalent Modification on Strigolactone Receptor Activation and Selectivity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- How does a small molecule bind at a cryptic binding site? 96%
- Reconciling ASPP-p53 Binding Mode Discrepancies through an Ensemble Binding Framework that Bridges Crystallography and NMR Data 95%
- Conformational plasticity and dynamic interactions of the N-terminal domain of the chemokine receptor CXCR1 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.