Back

A Generalized Framework for the Calcium Control Hypothesis Describes Weight-Dependent Synaptic Changes in Behavioral Time Scale Plasticity

Moldwin, T.; Azran, L. S.; Segev, I.

2023-08-27 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.07.13.548837 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brain modifies synaptic strengths to store new information via long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Evidence has mounted that long-term plasticity is controlled via concentrations of calcium ([Ca2+]) in postsynaptic spines. Several mathematical models describe this phenomenon, including those of Shouval, Bear, and Cooper (SBC) (Shouval et al., 2002, 2010) and Graupner and Brunel (GB)(Graupner & Brunel, 2012). Here we suggest a generalized version of the SBC and GB models, based on a fixed point - learning rate (FPLR) framework, where the synaptic [Ca2+] specifies a fixed point toward which the synaptic weight approaches asymptotically at a [Ca2+]-dependent rate. The FPLR framework offers a straightforward phenomenological interpretation of calcium-based plasticity: the calcium concentration tells the synaptic weight where it is going and how fast it goes there. The FPLR framework can flexibly incorporate various experimental findings, including the existence of multiple regions of [Ca2+] where no plasticity occurs, or plasticity in cerebellar Purkinje cells, where the directionality of calcium-based synaptic changes is thought to be reversed relative to cortical and hippocampal neurons. We also suggest a modeling approach that captures the dependency of late-phase plasticity stabilization on protein synthesis. We demonstrate that due to the asymptotic, saturating nature of synaptic changes in the FPLR rule, the result of frequency- and spike-timing-dependent plasticity protocols are weight-dependent. Finally, we show how the FPLR framework can explain plateau potential-induced place field formation in hippocampal CA1 neurons, also known as behavioral time scale plasticity (BTSP).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.9%
3
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
7
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
9
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
27
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
30
Molecular Brain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%