Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults in the United States
Kopel, H.; Nguyen, V. H.; Boileau, C.; Bogdanov, A.; Winer, I.; Ducruet, T.; Zeng, N.; Bonafede, M.; Esposito, D.; Martin, D.; Rosen, A.; Van de Velde, N.; Vermund, S.; Gravenstein, S.; Mansi, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe emergence of Omicron variants coincided with declining vaccine-induced protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and other COVID-19-related outcomes. Two bivalent mRNA vaccines, mRNA-1273.222 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 Bivalent (Pfizer-BioNTech) were developed to provide greater protection against the predominate circulating variants by including the mRNA that encodes both the ancestral (original) strain and BA.4/BA.5. We estimated their relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) in preventing COVID-19-related outcomes in the US. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using a US nationwide dataset linking primary care electronic health records (EHR) and pharmacy/medical claims data. The adult study population (aged [≥]18 years) received either mRNA-1273.222 or BNT162b2 Bivalent vaccination between August 31, 2022, and February 28, 2023. We used a propensity score weighting based on the inverse probability of treatment to adjust for the baseline differences in age, sex, race, ethnicity, geographic region, vaccination week, and health status between groups. Outcomes evaluated were rVE of the two bivalent mRNA vaccines against COVID-19-related hospitalizations (primary outcome) and outpatient visits (secondary). We weighted the vaccine groups prior to analysis and estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) using multivariable Cox regression models. We calculated rVE as (1-HR) x 100. ResultsWe evaluated outcomes for 1,034,538 mRNA-1273.222 and 1,670,666 BNT162b2 Bivalent vaccine recipients. The adjusted rVE of mRNA-1273.222 versus BNT162b2 Bivalent vaccines against COVID-19-related hospitalization was 9.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.6%-16.4%). The adjusted rVE against COVID-19-related outpatient visits was 5.1% (95% CI: 3.2%-6.9%). When evaluated by age group, the incremental relative effectiveness was greater. Among adults [≥] 65, rVE against COVID-19-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits was 13.5% (95% CI: 5.5%-20.8%) and 10.7% (8.2%-13.1%), respectively. ConclusionWe found greater effectiveness of mRNA-1273.222 compared with the BNT162b2 Bivalent vaccine in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalizations and outpatient visits, with increased benefits in older adults.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of a third dose of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 among adults aged ≥65 years in the United States 98%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 97%
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccines among immunocompromised adults in the United States 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine formulations in healthy adults: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study 95%
- Safety Monitoring of mRNA Vaccines Administered During the Initial 6 Months of the U.S. COVID-19 Vaccination Program: Reports to Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and v-safe 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine NVX-CoV2373 in Younger and Older Adults 96%
- Post-marketing active surveillance of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in persons aged 12-39 years in Italy: a multi-database, self-controlled case series study 95%
- Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants: a nationwide Danish cohort study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.