Focal transcranial direct current stimulation of auditory cortex in chronic tinnitus: A randomized controlled mechanistic trial
Leaver, A. M.; Chen, Y. J.; Parrish, T. B.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe goal of this pilot MRI study was to understand how focal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting auditory cortex changes brain function in chronic tinnitus. MethodsPeople with chronic tinnitus were randomized to active or sham tDCS on five consecutive days in this pilot mechanistic trial (n=10/group). Focal 4x1 tDCS (central anode, surround cathodes) targeted left auditory cortex, with single-blind 2mA current during twenty-minute sessions. Arterial spin-labeled and blood oxygenation level dependent MRI occurred immediately before and after the first tDCS session, and tinnitus symptoms were measured starting one week before the first tDCS session and through four weeks after the final session. ResultsAcute increases in cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity were noted in auditory cortex after the first active tDCS session. Reduced tinnitus loudness ratings after the final tDCS session correlated with acute change in functional connectivity between an auditory network and mediodorsal thalamus and prefrontal cortex. Reduced tinnitus intrusiveness also correlated with acute change in connectivity between precuneus and an auditory network. ConclusionsFocal auditory-cortex tDCS can influence function in thalamus, auditory, and prefrontal cortex, which may associate with improved tinnitus. SignificanceWith future refinement, noninvasive brain stimulation targeting auditory cortex could become a viable intervention for tinnitus. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIFocal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of auditory cortex changes cerebral blood flow and connectivity in tinnitus C_LIO_LITinnitus loudness ratings decreased on average after five sessions of active focal tDCS C_LIO_LIAcute changes in auditory, thalamic, and prefrontal function may predict quieter tinnitus after five sessions C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal relationship between the right auditory cortex and speech-evoked envelope-following response: Evidence from combined tDCS and EEG 95%
- Neural Alpha Oscillations and Auditory Steady State Responses During Adaptation to a Cochlear Implant 93%
- Cochlear implantation restores cortical processing for spatial hearing in asymmetric hearing loss 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hearing Loss and Tinnitus: Uncover the Mechanism of Tinnitus using Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) Technologies 96%
- Recent-Onset and Persistent Tinnitus: Uncover the Differences in Brain Activities using Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies 95%
- Sound-Evoked Plasticity Differentiates Tinnitus from Non-Tinnitus Mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- E-field guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates oscillatory brain activity dynamics in tinnitus 95%
- Locus coeruleus neuromelanin predicts ease of attaining and maintaining neural states of high attentiveness 88%
- Causal Interactions in Brain Networks Predict Pain Levels in Trigeminal Neuralgia 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review on electroencephalography for objective measures of tinnitus with potential for clinical application 95%
- Parallel EEG assessment of different sound predictability levels in tinnitus 95%
- The role of hidden hearing loss in tinnitus: insights from early markers of peripheral hearing damage 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensory Entrained TMS (seTMS) enhances motor cortex excitability 92%
- Title: Reliability, sensitivity and predictive value of fMRI during multiple object tracking as a marker of cognitive training gain in combination with tDCS in stroke survivors 92%
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Modulate fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity in Methamphetamine Users: A Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.