Back

Estimation of indirect genetic effects and heritability under assortative mating

Young, A. S.

2023-07-11 genetics
10.1101/2023.07.10.548458 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Both direct genetic effects (effects of alleles in an individual on that individual) and indirect genetic effects -- effects of alleles in an individual (e.g. parents) on another individual (e.g. offspring) -- can contribute to phenotypic variation and genotype-phenotype associations. Here, we consider a phenotype affected by direct and parental indirect genetic effects under assortative mating at equilibrium. We generalize classical theory to derive a decomposition of the equilibrium phenotypic variance in terms of direct and indirect genetic effect components. We extend this theory to show that popular methods for estimating indirect genetic effects or genetic nurture through analysis of parental and offspring polygenic predictors (called polygenic indices or scores -- PGIs or PGSs) are substantially biased by assortative mating. We propose an improved method for estimating indirect genetic effects while accounting for assortative mating that can also correct heritability estimates for bias due to assortative mating. We validate our method in simulations and apply it to PGIs for height and educational attainment (EA), estimating that the equilibrium heritability of height is 0.699 (S.E. = 0.075) and finding no evidence for indirect genetic effects on height. We estimate a very high correlation between parents underlying genetic components for EA, 0.755 (S.E. = 0.035), which is inconsistent with twin based estimates of the heritability of EA, possibly due to confounding in the EA PGI and/or in twin studies. We implement our method in the software package snipar, enabling researchers to apply the method to data including observed and/or imputed parental genotypes. We provide a theoretical framework for understanding the results of PGI analyses and a practical methodology for estimating heritability and indirect genetic effects while accounting for assortative mating.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.8%
2
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Behavior Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
8
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.0%
10
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
Biometrics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Biostatistics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.5%