Back

A novel nomogram based on serum lipid for identifying the patients at risk for rapid progression of advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Wu, M.; He, Y.; Pan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, B.

2023-07-08 urology
10.1101/2023.07.07.23292351 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSerum lipids were reported to be significant predictive factors in various tumors. In order to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) free survival in advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients, the goal of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of the lipid profiles. Material and MethodsThe follow-up information of 146 CRPC patients who received androgen deprivation therapy as the first and only therapy before progression were retrospectively examined. To evaluate prognostic variables, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used. The concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA) were used to design and evaluate a novel nomogram model. ResultsTotal cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (apoB), N stage and Gleason sum were determined to be independent prognostic markers and were combined to create a nomogram. This nomogram performed well in the customized prediction of CRPC development at 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th month. The C-indexes in training and validation sets were 0.740 and 0.755, respectively. ROC curves, calibration plots, and DCA all suggested favorable discrimination and predictive ability. Besides, the nomogram also performed better predictive ability than N stage and Gleason sum. The Nomogram-related risk score divided the patient population into two groups with significant progression disparities. ConclusionsThe established nomogram could aid in identifying the patients at high risk for rapid progression of advanced HSPC, so as to formulate individualized therapeutic regimens and follow-up strategies in time.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
6
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
10
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
11
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
12
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
13
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
16
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%