Back

Bio-optical signatures of insitu photosymbionts predict bleaching severity prior to thermal stress in the Caribbean coral species Acropora palmata

Hoadley, K.; Lowry, S.; McQuagge, A.; Dalessandri, S.; Lockridge, G.; Karabelas, E.; Klepac, C. N.; Kenkel, C. D.; Muller, E.

2023-07-09 physiology
10.1101/2023.07.06.547971 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The identification of bleaching tolerant traits among individual corals is a major focus for many restoration and conservation initiatives but often relies on large scale or high-throughput experimental manipulations which may not be accessible to many front-line restoration practitioners. Here we evaluate a machine learning technique to generate a predictive model which estimates bleaching severity using non-destructive chlorophyll-a fluorescence photophysiological metrics measured with a low-cost and open access bio-optical tool. First, a four-week long thermal bleaching experiment was performed on 156 genotypes of Acropora palmata at a land-based restoration facility. Resulting bleaching responses (percent change in Fv/Fm or Absorbance) significantly differed across the four distinct phenotypes generated via a photophysiology-based dendrogram, indicating strong concordance between fluorescence-based photophysiological metrics and future bleaching severity. Next, these correlations were used to train and then test a Random Forest algorithm-based model using a bootstrap resampling technique. Correlation between predicted and actual bleaching responses in test corals was significant (p < 0.0001) and increased with the number of corals used in model training (Peak average R2 values of 0.42 and 0.33 for Fv/Fm and absorbance, respectively). Strong concordance between photophysiology-based phenotypes and future bleaching severity may provide a highly scalable means for assessing reef corals.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.0%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.3%
3
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Coral Reefs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
5
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
6
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
12
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
16
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
18
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
19
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
20
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%