Back

Inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission alters functional organization and efficiency in cortical neural networks

Weir, J. S.; Huse Ramstad, O.; Sandvig, A.; Sandvig, I.

2023-07-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.07.05.547785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fundamental neural mechanisms such as activity dependent Hebbian and homeostatic neuroplasticity are driven by balanced excitatory - inhibitory synaptic transmission, and work in tandem to coordinate and regulate complex neural network dynamics in both healthy and perturbed conditions. These neuroplasticity processes shape neural network activity, as well as structural and functional aspects of network organization, information transmission and processing. While crucial for all aspects of network function, understanding how the brain utilizes plasticity mechanisms to retain or regain function during and after perturbation is often challenging. This is because these processes occur at varying spatiotemporal scales simultaneously across diverse circuits and brain regions and are thus highly complicated to distinguish from other underlying mechanisms. However, neuroplasticity and self-organizing properties of the brain are largely conserved in in vitro biological neural networks, and as such, these networks enable us to investigate both structural and functional plasticity responses to perturbation networks at the micro and mesoscale level. In this study, we selectively silenced excitatory synaptic transmission in in vitro neural networks to investigate the impact of the perturbation on structural and functional network organization and resilience. Our results demonstrate that selective inhibition of excitatory transmission leads to transient de-clustering of modular structure, increased path length and degree in perturbed networks. These changes indicate a transient loss of network efficiency; with the network subsequently reorganizing to a state of increased clustering and short path lengths following recovery. These findings highlight the remarkable capacity of neural networks to reconfigure their functional organization following perturbation. The ability to detect and decode such processes as they evolve highlights the robustness of our models to investigate certain dynamic network properties that are often not accessible by in vivo methods.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
5
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
9
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
19
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%