Genetic structure of major depression symptoms across clinical and community cohorts
Adams, M. J.; Thorp, J. G.; Jermy, B. S.; Kwong, A. S. F.; Koiv, K.; Grotzinger, A. D.; Nivard, M. G.; Marshall, S.; Milaneschi, Y.; Baune, B. T.; Mueller-Myhsok, B.; Penninx, B. W.; Boomsma, D. I.; Levinson, D. F.; Breen, G.; Pistis, G.; Grabe, H. J.; Tiemeier, H.; Berger, K.; Rietschel, M.; Magnusson, P. K.; Uher, R.; Hamilton, S. P.; Lucae, S.; Lehto, K.; Li, Q. S.; Byrne, E. M.; Hickie, I. B.; Martin, N. G.; Medland, S. E.; Wray, N. R.; Tucker-Drob, E. M.; Estonian Biobank Research Team, ; Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, ; Lewis, C. M.; McI
Show abstract
Diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder allow for heterogeneous symptom profiles but genetic analysis of major depressive symptoms has the potential to identify clinical and aetiological subtypes. There are several challenges to integrating symptom data from genetically-informative cohorts, such as sample size differences between clinical and community cohorts and various patterns of missing data. We conducted genome-wide association studies of major depressive symptoms in three clinical cohorts that were enriched for affected participants (Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Australian Genetics of Depression Study, Generation Scotland) and three community cohorts (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, Estonian Biobank, and UK Biobank). We fit a series of confirmatory factor models with factors that accounted for how symptom data was sampled and then compared alternative models with different symptom factors. The best fitting model had a distinct factor for Appetite/Weight symptoms and an additional measurement factor that accounted for missing data patterns in the community cohorts (use of Depression and Anhedonia as gating symptoms). The results show the importance of assessing the directionality of symptoms (such as hypersomnia versus insomnia) and of accounting for study and measurement design when meta-analysing genetic association data.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Major Depression Polygenic Risk Scores to Explore the Depressive Symptom Continuum 96%
- Major depression symptom severity associations with willingness to exert effort and patch foraging strategy 95%
- No Relationship between Male Pubertal Timing and Depression – New Insights from Epidemiology and Mendelian Randomization 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain-Symptom Network Models of Depressive Symptoms: Understanding Heterogeneity and Clinical Implications 95%
- Neurocognitive deficits, psychotrauma, and inflammation shape major depressive disorder and its phenome features 94%
- Glycoprotein Acetyls and Depression: testing for directionality and potential causality using longitudinal data and Mendelian randomization analyses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Influence of Phenotyping Method on Structural Neuroimaging Associations with Depression in UK Biobank 95%
- A polygenic predictor of treatment-resistant depression using whole exome sequencing and genome-wide genotyping 94%
- Acylcarnitines metabolism in depression: association with diagnostic status, depression severity and symptom profile in the NESDA cohort 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the genetic overlap of suicide-related behaviors and substance use disorders 96%
- Effects of polygenic risk for suicide attempt and risky behavior on brain structure in young people with familial risk of bipolar disorder 94%
- Polygenic risk scores for psychiatric, inflammatory, and cardio-metabolic traits and diseases highlight possible genetic overlaps with suicide attempt and treatment-emergent suicidal ideation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.