Post-birth Exposure Contrasts for Children during the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Randomized Controlled Trial
Pillarisetti, A.; Ye, W.; Balakrishnan, K.; Rosa, G.; Diaz-Artiga, A.; Underhill, L. J.; Steenland, K.; Peel, J. L.; Kirby, M. A.; McCracken, J.; Waller, L.; Chang, H.; Wang, J.; Dusabimana, E.; Ndagijimana, F.; Sambanbdam, S.; Mukhopadhyay, K.; Kearns, K. A.; Campbell, D.; Kremer, J.; Rosenthal, J.; Ghosh, A.; Clark, M. L.; Checkley, W.; Clasen, T.; Naeher, L.; Piedrahita, R.; Johnson, M.; Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial Investigators,
Show abstract
Exposure to household air pollution is a leading cause of ill-health globally. The Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of a free liquefied petroleum gas stove and fuel intervention on birth outcomes and maternal and child health. As part of HAPIN, an extensive exposure assessment was conducted. Here, we report on PM2.5 and CO exposures of young children ([≤] 15 months old) reconstructed using a Bluetooth-beacon based time-activity monitoring system coupled with microenvironmental pollutant monitors. Median (IQR) exposures to PM2.5 were 65.1 (33 - 128.2) {micro}g/m3 in the control group and 22.9 (17.2 - 35.3) {micro}g/m3 in the intervention group; for CO, median (IQR) exposures were 1.1 (0.3 - 2.9) ppm and 0.2 (0 - 0.7) ppm for control and intervention group, respectively. Exposure reductions were stable over time and consistent with previous findings for the childrens mothers. In the intervention group, 75% of childrens reconstructed exposures were below the WHO interim target guideline value of 35 {micro}g/m3, while 26% were below the standard in the control group. Our findings suggest that an LPG fuel and stove intervention can substantially reduce childrens exposure to household air pollution.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heat Exposure Among Adult Women in Rural Tamil Nadu, India 97%
- Characterization of annual average traffic-related air pollution levels (particle number, black carbon, nitrogen dioxide, PM 2.5 , carbon dioxide) in the greater Seattle area from a year-long mobile monitoring campaign 96%
- Rats Sniff Off Toxic Air 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure contrasts of pregnant women during the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network randomized controlled trial 98%
- Using parametric g-computation to estimate the effect of long-term exposure to air pollution on mortality risk and simulate the benefits of hypothetical policies: the Canadian Community Health Survey cohort (2005 to 2015) 97%
- Association between Fine Particulate Matter Exposure and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease among a Cognitively Healthy Population-based Cohort 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brick kiln pollution and its impact on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis 97%
- Windows of Susceptibility to Air Pollution During and Surrounding Pregnancy in Relation to Longitudinal Maternal Measures of Adiposity and Lipid Profiles 97%
- Using low-cost sensors and GPS to assess spatiotemporal variations in personal exposure to PM2.5 in the Washington State Twin Registry 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lifetime air pollution exposure from prenatal to 18 years and cardiovascular health in young adulthood: findings from a UK birth cohort 96%
- Nitrogen dioxide exposures from LPG stoves in a cleaner-cooking intervention trial 95%
- Long-term exposure to air-pollution and COVID-19 mortality in England: a hierarchical spatial analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and birth outcomes in a pregnancy cohort in Nairobi, Kenya. 94%
- Rationale and study protocol of the MAMELI Cohort study (MApping the Methylation of repetitive elements to track the Exposome effects on health: the city of Legnano as a LIving lab) 94%
- Rural Roads to Cognitive Resilience (RRR): A prospective cohort study protocol 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.