Back

Teledentistry for improving access to, and quality of oral health care: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Kengne Talla, P.; Allison, P.; Bussieres, A.; Giraudeau, N.; Komarova, S.; Basiren, Q.; Bergeron, F.; Emami, E.

2023-07-05 dentistry and oral medicine
10.1101/2023.07.04.23292218 medRxiv
Show abstract

Digital technologies are becoming essential to address and optimize the suboptimal performance of healthcare systems. Teledentistry involves the use of information and communication technology to improve access to oral health care and the quality of oral health care delivery. Several systematic reviews (SRs) have been conducted to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of teledentistry but with conflicting results. The aim of this review is to comprehensively summarize available SRs and provide evidence on the impact of teledentistry on access to oral care, patients and oral healthcare providers outcomes, quality of oral health care and costs. This protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42022373964). Six electronic databases including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Embase.com), CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos will be searched for SRs of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed reviews evaluating teledentistry modalities involving both patients and/or oral health care providers (OHCPs). We will include only studies published in English or French. The primary outcomes will be considered from the patients perspective (e.g., access to oral health care, patient-reported outcomes, and experiences). The secondary outcomes will include outcomes from patients and OHCPs (e.g., clinical outcomes, safety, behaviors, and costs). Two independent reviewers will perform data screening, data extraction and will assess the quality of included studies using the AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. Data will be synthesized narratively and presented by tables and graphs. We will report any overlap of primary studies in the SRs. A statement on the strength of evidence for each outcome will be provided if possible. This review will inform decision-makers, patients, OHCPs, and researchers on the potential effectiveness, benefits, and challenges of teledentistry and support them in making recommendations for its use. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at conferences, and on social media.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
34.2%
2
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
4
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
10
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
11
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
20
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%