Subcellular pathways through VG3 amacrine cells provide regionally tuned object-motion-selective signals in mouse retina.
Friedrichsen, K.; Hsiang, J.-C.; McCoy, L.; Valkova, K.; Kerschensteiner, D.; Morgan, J. L.
Show abstract
We combined subcellular calcium imaging and connectomic reconstruction to understand the flow of information through a plexus of excitatory VGluT3-expressing mouse retinal amacrine cells (VG3s). We found that VG3s received inputs from all nearby bipolar cell types but exhibited a strong preference for the fast type 3a bipolar cells. We used our connectivity map and physiological recordings to predict the influence of these bipolar cells on different types of RGCs innervated by VG3s and found that the depth of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dendritic arbor stratification determined the RGCs view of bipolar cells through the VG3 plexus. We also found that both VG3s and their RGC targets were often innervated by the same bipolar cells. RGCs that extend processes into the middle layers of the inner plexiform layer, therefore, encounter a plexus of small object motion selective glutamatergic excitation that is complementary to the local bipolar cell input.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spontaneous retinal waves generate long-range horizontal connectivity in visual cortex 95%
- Visual recognition is heralded by shifts in local field potential oscillations and inhibitory networks in primary visual cortex 95%
- Global motion processing by populations of direction-selective retinal ganglion cells 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spinal V1 neurons inhibit motor targets locally and sensory targets distally to coordinate locomotion 96%
- Dendritic Architecture Enables de Novo Computation of Salient Motion in the Superior Colliculus 96%
- Binocular processing facilitates escape behavior through multiple pathways to the superior colliculus 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.