Back

Machine learning algorithms in spatiotemporal gait analysis can identify patients with Parkinsons disease.

Fernando, P. V. R.; Pannu, M.; Natarajan, P.; Fonseka, R. D.; Singh, N.; Jayalath, S.; Maharaj, M.; Mobbs, R. J.

2023-07-06 surgery
10.1101/2023.07.03.23292200
Show abstract

Changes to spatiotemporal gait metrics in gait-altering conditions are characteristic of the pathology. This data can be interpreted by machine learning (ML) models which have recently emerged as an adjunct to clinical medicine. However, the literature is undecided regarding its utility in diagnosing pathological gait and is heterogeneous in its approach to applying ML techniques. This study aims to address these gaps in knowledge. This was a prospective observational study involving 32 patients with Parkinsons disease and 88 normative subjects. Spatiotemporal gait metrics were gathered from all subjects using the MetaMotionC inertial measurement unit and data obtained were used to train and evaluate the performance of 10 machine learning models. Principal component analysis and Genetic Algorithm were amongst the feature selection techniques used. Classification models included Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naive - Bayes, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Networks. ML algorithms can accurately distinguish pathological gait in Parkinsons disease from that of normative controls. Two models which used the Random Forest classifier with Principal Component analysis and Genetic Algorithm feature selection techniques separately, were 100% accurate in its predictions and had an F1 score of 1. A third model using principal component analysis and Artificial neural networks was equally as successful (100% accuracy, F1 = 1). We conclude that ML algorithms can accurately distinguish pathological gait from normative controls in Parkinsons Disease. Random Forest classifiers, with Genetic Algorithm feature selection are the preferred ML techniques for this purpose as they produce the highest performing model. Author summaryThe way humans walk, are emblematic of their overall health status. These walking patterns, otherwise, can be captured as gait metrics from small and portable wearable sensors. Data gathered from these sensors can be interpreted by machine learning algorithms which can then be used to accurately distinguish healthy and non-healthy patients based on their gait or walking pattern. The applications of this technology are many and varied. Firstly, it can be used to simply aid in diagnosis as explored in this paper. In future, researchers may use their understanding of normal and pathological gait, and their differences to quantify how severely ones gait is affected in a disease state. This data can be used to track, and quantify, improvements or further deteriorations post treatment, whether these be medication-based or interventions like surgery. Retrospective analyses on data such as this can be used to judge the value of an intervention in reducing a patients disability, and advise health related expenditure.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 15%
1.7× avg
2
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 6%
2.8× avg
3
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 0.9%
28× avg
4
Neurobiology of Disease
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
#1
140× avg
5
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 1%
21× avg
6
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.7%
21× avg
7
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
30× avg
8
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.5%
32× avg
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.2%
23× avg
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 6%
4.3× avg
11
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 4%
5.3× avg
12
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 9%
2.2× avg
13
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
9.8× avg
14
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 14%
2.0× avg
15
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 22 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
16
IEEE Access
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
17
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 48%
0.9%
18
Scientific Data
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 30 published papers
Top 3%
5.7× avg
19
npj Parkinson's Disease
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 35 published papers
Top 2%
4.1× avg
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
21
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
9.6× avg
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 7%
2.0× avg
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 15%
0.7%
24
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
25
Movement Disorders
Wiley · based on 49 published papers
Top 3%
2.1× avg
26
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
6.9× avg