Driving uptake of missed routine vaccines in adolescent and adult migrants: a prospective observational mixed-methods pilot study of catch-up vaccination in UK general practice
Crawshaw, A. F.; Goldsmith, L. P.; Deal, A.; Carter, J.; Knights, F.; Seedat, F.; Lau, K.; Hayward, S. E.; Yong, J.; Fyle, D.; Aspray, N.; Iwami, M.; Ciftci, Y.; Wurie, F.; Majeed, A.; Forster, A. S.; Hargreaves, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundMigrants in Europe may be vulnerable to vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs) because of missed routine vaccines in childhood in their country of origin and marginalisation from health and vaccine systems. To align with European schedules, migrants should be offered catch-up vaccinations, considering MMR, Td/IPV, and age-appropriate MenACWY and HPV. However, awareness and implementation of catch-up guidelines by primary care staff in the UK is considered to be poor, and there is a lack of research on effective approaches to strengthen the primary-care pathway. MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational mixed-methods pilot study Vacc on Track (May 2021-September 2022) to better understand and define new care pathways to increase catch-up vaccination for adolescent and adult migrants presenting to primary care ([≥]16 years, born outside Western Europe, North America, Australia, or New Zealand) in two London boroughs. We designed a standardised data collection tool to assess rates of under-vaccination in migrant populations and previous VPDs, which then prompted a referral to practice nurses to deliver catch-up vaccination for those with uncertain or incomplete immunisation status, following UK guidelines. We explored views of practice staff on delivering catch-up vaccination to migrant populations through focus group discussions and engaged migrants in in-depth interviews around approaches to catch-up vaccination. Data were analysed in STATA12 and Microsoft Excel. ResultsWe recruited 57 migrant participants (mean age 41 [SD 7.2] years; 62% female; mean 11.3 [SD 9.1] years in UK) from 18 countries, with minimum 6 months follow-up. We did 3 focus groups with 30 practice staff and 39 qualitative in-depth interviews with migrants. Nearly all migrant participants required catch-up vaccination for MMR (86%) and Td/IPV (88%) and most reported not having been previously engaged in UK primary care around catch-up vaccination. 12 (55%) of 22 participants in Site 1 reported a past VPD, including measles and rubella. 53 (93%) of participants were referred for catch-up vaccination. However, although 43 (81%) had at least one dose (at follow-up) of a required vaccine, only 6 (12%) referred for Td/IPV and 33 (64%) of those referred for MMR had completed their required course and vaccination pathway at follow-up, suggesting there were a range of personal and environmental obstacles to migrants accessing vaccinations and all multiple doses of vaccines that need to be better considered. Staff identified seven barriers to delivering catch-up vaccines to migrants, including limited time for appointments and follow-up, language and literacy barriers when taking histories and to encourage vaccination, lack of staff knowledge of current guidelines, inadequate engagement routes, and the absence of primary care targets or incentives. ConclusionsOur findings suggest adolescent and adult migrants are an under-vaccinated group and would benefit from being offered catch-up vaccination on arrival to the UK. Primary care is an important setting to deliver catch-up vaccination, but effective pathways are currently lacking, and improving vaccine coverage for key routine vaccines across a broader range of migrant groups will require designated staff champions, training, awareness-raising and financial incentives. Novel ways to deliver vaccinations in community settings should be explored, along with co-designing community-based interventions to raise awareness among these populations of the benefits of life-course immunisation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “ We don’t routinely check vaccination background in adults” : A national qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to vaccine delivery and uptake in adult migrants through UK primary care 98%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the UK’s COVID-19 vaccination programme 94%
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 94%
- Active vaccine safety surveillance: Experience from a prospective cohort event monitoring study of COVID-19 vaccines in Kenya 94%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated risk factors among first antenatal care attendees in Zambia, 2021-2022: a repeated cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Uptake of infant and pre-school immunisations in Scotland and England during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study of routinely collected data 96%
- Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine coverage and indirect protection against invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia hospitalisations in Australia: a retrospective record linkage cohort study 93%
- Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utilization of health care services before and after media attention about fatal side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine: a nation-wide register-based event study 91%
- Cost-effectiveness of whole area testing of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in Merthyr Tydfil, 2020: A Modelling and economic analysis 90%
- Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.