Predicting non-response to ketamine for depression: a symptom-level analysis of real-world data
Miller, E. A.; Afshar, H. T.; Mishra, J.; Ramanathan, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundKetamine helps some patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD), but reliable methods for predicting which patients will, or will not, respond to treatment are lacking. MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of PHQ-9 item response data from 120 military veterans with TRD who received repeated doses of intravenous racemic ketamine or intranasal eskatamine in a real-world clinic. Regression models were fit to individual patients symptom trajectories and model parameters were analyzed to characterize how different symptoms responded to treatment. Logistic regression classifiers were used to predict treatment response using patients baseline depression symptoms alone. Finally, by parametrically adjusting the classifier decision thresholds, the full space of models was searched to identify the best models for predicting non-response with very high negative predictive value. ResultsModel slopes indicated progressive improvement on all nine symptoms, but the symptom of depressed mood improved faster than the symptom of low energy. The first principal component (PC) represented a data-driven measurement of overall treatment response, while the second PC divided the symptoms into affective and somatic subdomains. Logistic regression classifiers predicted response better than chance using baseline symptoms, but these models achieved only 60.2% predictive value. Using threshold tuning, we identified models that can predict non-response with a negative predictive value of 96.4%, while retaining a specificity of 22.1%, suggesting we could successfully identify 22% of individuals who would not respond purely based on baseline symptom scores. ConclusionsWe developed an approach for identifying a subset of patients with TRD who will likely not respond to ketamine. This could inform rational treatment recommendations to avoid additional treatment failures.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 94%
- A polygenic predictor of treatment-resistant depression using whole exome sequencing and genome-wide genotyping 93%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low predictive power of clinical features for relapse prediction after antidepressant discontinuation in a naturalistic setting 95%
- Predictive Patterns of Antidepressant Response from Pre-Treatment Reward Processing using Functional MRI and Deep Learning: Key Results from the EMBARC Randomized Clinical Trial 94%
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognitive Phenotype Shifts in Risk-Taking: Interplay of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Behaviors and Intensified Depression 94%
- Neurocognitive measures of self-blame and risk prediction models of recurrence in major depressive disorder 94%
- Machine learning identifies large-scale reward-related activity modulated by dopaminergic enhancement in major depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consistent Differential Effects of Bupropion and Mirtazapine in Major Depression 95%
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 94%
- Individual Deviations from Normative Electroencephalographic Connectivity Predict Antidepressant Response 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 95%
- A common symptom geometry of mood improvement under sertraline and placebo associated with distinct neural patterns 94%
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors associated with self-reported antidepressant response outcomes in the UK Biobank 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.