Back

From the shallows to the depths: A new probe set to target ultraconserved elements for Malacostraca

Geburzi, J. C.; Rodriguez Flores, P. C.; Derkarabetian, S.; Giribet, G.

2023-07-02 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.06.30.547307 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Since its introduction about a decade ago, target enrichment sequencing of ultraconserved elements (UCEs) has proven to be an invaluable tool for studies across evolutionary scales, and thus employed from population genetics, to historical biogeography and deep phylogenetics. UCE probe sets are available for an increasing range of major taxonomic groups, including cnidarians, vertebrates, terrestrial arthropods, and mollusks. Here, we present the first probe set targeting UCEs in crustaceans, specifically designed for decapods and other malacostracan lineages. Probes were designed using published genomes of nine decapod and one peracarid species, as well as raw Nanopore long reads of one additional brachyuran species. The final probe set consists of about 20,000 probes, targeting 1,348 unique UCE loci. Preliminary analyses of UCE data obtained from an intertidal mangrove crab, and from deep-sea squat lobsters indicate high UCE recovery rates (about 1,000 loci per sample) in evolutionarily shallow datasets. To test the probe set at deeper phylogenetic levels, we compiled a dataset across Malacostraca (including representatives of Decapoda, Peracarida, Euphausiacea, Stomatopoda, and Phyllocarida), and were able to recover hundreds of UCEs for the non-decapod species, expanding the targeted use of this UCE probeset to all Malacostraca. Additionally, we recovered similar numbers of UCEs from historical museum specimens up to > 150 years old, that were included in all datasets, confirming that UCEs are a fruitful technique for leveraging museum specimens for genomic studies. Overall, our results highlight the versatility of this UCE probe set and its high potential for crustacean evolutionary studies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.