Definitive environmental DNA research on aquatic insects: Analysis optimization using the recently developed MtInsects-16S primers set
Takenaka, M.; Hasebe, Y.; Yano, K.; Okamoto, S.; Tojo, K.
Show abstract
Long-term biodiversity monitoring is necessary for the conservation and management of water resources. Notably, aquatic insects have been used as an indicator of water quality because they provide important basic information about freshwater ecosystems and water resources. Although environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys can enable easy and effective biomonitoring of aquatic insects, previous studies have not successfully detected all insect species, and there has been frequent amplification of nontarget taxa (e.g., algae and diatoms). Therefore, we developed a universal primers set, MtInsects-16S, for eDNA analyses of insects in the mtDNA 16SrRNA region. Furthermore, a well-established database of aquatic insects, especially the MtInsects-16S DNA region of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera in Kanagawa Prefecture, which was the target area in this study, was constructed. Therefore, in this study, we conducted eDNA analyses using a universal primers set and using a well-established database. We conducted and compared capture surveys at the same sites to examine the detection capability of eDNA for Insecta. As a result, eDNA analyses using MtInsects- 16S not only detected almost all of the captured species but also detected many more species without amplifying nontarget taxa. This study demonstrated the application of eDNA analyses with unprecedented accuracy and reliability. It was also shown that community structure by eDNA reflected a relatively narrow range at the water sampling point. Although the data accumulation for constructing locally specific databases is an urgent issue, using the MtInsects-16S region is expected to be a breakthrough in the metabarcoding of insects.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental DNA phylogeography: successful reconstruction of phylogeographic patterns of multiple fish species from a cup of water 97%
- Environmental DNA analysis shows high potential as a tool for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in a wild fish population 97%
- Estimation of Species Abundance Based on the Number of Segregating Sites using Environmental DNA (eDNA) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Significant improvement of environmental DNA assay by targeting retrotransposon sequences characteristic to Anguilla eels 97%
- Differences in the genetic structure between and within two landlocked Ayu groups with different migration patterns in Lake Biwa revealed by environmental DNA analysis 96%
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Haplotype-level metabarcoding of freshwater macroinvertebrate species: a prospective tool for population genetic analysis 96%
- Evaluation of biodiversity in estuaries using environmental DNA metabarcoding 96%
- Development and validation of versatile species-specific primer assays for eDNA monitoring and authentication of 10 commercially important Peruvian marine species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of DNA extraction kits on freshwater fungal DNA metabarcoding 96%
- eDNA metabarcoding shows highly diverse but distinct shallow, mid-water, and deep-water eukaryotic communities within a marine biodiversity hotspot 94%
- Implementing high-throughput insect barcoding in microbiome studies: impact of non-destructive DNA extraction on microbiome reconstruction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- QT-AMP: Quanti-Tray-based amplicon sequencing for simultaneous quantification and identification of enterococci for microbial source tracking 95%
- Space-time dynamics in monitoring neotropical fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding 94%
- Development and application of eDNA-based tools for the conservation of white-clawed crayfish 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.