Is a Picture Worth 1,000 SNPs? Effects of User-Submitted Photographs on Ancestry Estimates from Direct-to-Consumer Canine Genetic Tests
Rando, H.; Graim, K.; Hampikian, G.; Greene, C. S.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the breed ancestry predictions of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests for dogs are influenced by the user-provided photograph. AnimalsTwelve pet dogs considered purebred (i.e., registered with a breed organization) representing twelve different breeds. MethodsSix buccal swabs per dog were collected by the owners and submitted to six DTC genetic testing companies. The experimenters registered each sample with the company. For half of the dogs, the registration included a photograph of the DNA donor. For the other half of the dogs, photographs were swapped between dogs. Analysis of the DNA and breed ancestry prediction was conducted by each company. Each companys breed predictions were evaluated to assess whether the condition (i.e., matching versus shuffled photograph) affected the odds of identifying the DNA donors registered breed. A convolutional neural network was also used to predict breed based solely on the photograph as a positive control. ResultsFive of the six tests always produced results that included the registered breed. One test and the convolutional neural network were unlikely to identify the registered breed and frequently returned results that included the breed in the photograph. This result suggests that one test on the market is relying on the photograph more than the DNA sample. Additionally, differences in the predictions made across all tests underscore the challenge of identifying breed ancestry, even in purebred dogs. Clinical RelevanceVeterinarians are likely to encounter patients who have conducted DTC genetic testing and may find themselves in the position of explaining genetic test results that they did not order. This systematic comparison of tests on the market provides context for interpreting unexpected results from consumer-grade DTC genetic testing kits.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- True Colors: commercially-acquired morphological genotypes reveal hidden allele variation among dog breeds, informing both trait ancestry and breed potential 94%
- Domestic dogs maintain positive clinical, nutritional, and hematological health outcomes when fed a commercial plant-based diet for a year 92%
- Age at cancer diagnosis by breed, weight, sex, and cancer type in a cohort of over 3,000 dogs: determining the optimal age to initiate cancer screening in canine patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A reduced SNP panel optimised for non-invasive genetic assessment of a genetically impoverished conservation icon, the European bison 93%
- Phenogenomic resources immortalized in a panel of wild-derived strains of five species of house mice 90%
- Evaluation of Cognitive Function in the Dog Aging Project: Associations with Baseline Canine Characteristics 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI for IACUC: Accurate Initial Assessment of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Protocols 89%
- Prime editing outperforms homology-directed repair as a tool for CRISPR-mediated variant knock-in in zebrafish 87%
- Refined Tamoxifen Administration in Mice by Encouraging Voluntary Consumption of Palatable Formulations. 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Canine tumor mutation rate is positively correlated with TP53 mutation across cancer types and breeds 93%
- A cattle graph genome incorporating global breed diversity 90%
- Paleogenomics suggest domesticated camelid herding and wild camelid hunting in early pastoralist societies in the Atacama Desert 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical genetics lacks standard definitions and protocols for the collection and use of diversity measures 89%
- Rare variants in PRKCI cause Van der Woude syndrome and other features of peridermopathy 88%
- Identification of actionable genetic variants in 4,198 Scottish volunteers from the Viking Genes research cohort and implementation of return of results 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.