Predicting up to 10 year breast cancer risk using longitudinal mammographic screening history
Wang, X.; Tan, T.; Gao, Y.; Su, R.; Zhang, T.; Han, L.; Teuwen, J.; D'Angelo, A.; Drukker, C. A.; Schmidt, M. K.; Beets-Tan, R.; Karssemeijer, N.; Mann, R.
Show abstract
Risk assessment of breast cancer (BC) seeks to enhance individualized screening and prevention strategies. BC risk informs healthy individuals of the short- and long-term likelihood of cancer development, also enabling detection of existing BC. Recent mammographic-based deep learning (DL) risk models outperform traditional risk factor-based models and achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) at short-term risk prediction, but mainly use single-time exams, which seem to rely more on detecting existing lesions. We present a novel temporospatial and explainable deep learning risk model, the Multi-Time Point Breast Cancer Risk Model (MTP-BCR), which learns from longitudinal mammography data to identify subtle changes in breast tissue that may signal future malignancy. Utilizing a large in-house dataset of 171,168 screening mammograms from 42,792 consecutive exams involving 9,133 women, our model demonstrates a significant improvement in long-term (10-year) risk prediction with an area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC) of 0.80, outperforming the traditional BCSC 10-year risk model and other SOTA methods at 5-year AUC in various screening cohorts. Furthermore, MTP-BCR provides unilateral breast-level predictions, achieving AUCs up to 0.81 and 0.77 for 5-year risk and 10-year risk assessments, respectively. The heatmaps derived from our model may help clinicians better understand the progression from normal tissue to cancerous growth, enhancing interpretability in breast cancer risk assessment. TeaserMTP-BCR model uses multi-time points mammograms and rich risk factors to predict 10-year breast cancer risk more accurately.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images 95%
- Teacher-student collaborated multiple instance learning for pan-cancer PDL1 expression prediction from histopathology slides 94%
- Artificial Intelligence System Reduces False-Positive Findings in the Interpretation of Breast Ultrasound Exams 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducible And Clinically Translatable Deep Neural Networks For Cervical Screening 94%
- Aggregation of Cohorts for Histopathological Diagnosis with Deep Morphological Analysis 93%
- Automated detection of the HER2 gene amplification status in Fluorescence in situ hybridization images for the diagnostics of cancer tissues 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 93%
- Biologically-informed deep neural networks provide quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity in post-treatment glioblastoma 91%
- STPath: A Generative Foundation Model for Integrating Spatial Transcriptomics and Whole Slide Images 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generative Adversarial Networks Accurately Reconstruct Pan-Cancer Histology from Pathologic, Genomic, and Radiographic Latent Features 91%
- Spectral imaging enables contrast agent-free real-time ischemia monitoring in laparoscopic surgery 90%
- CancerVar: an Artificial Intelligence empowered platform for clinical interpretation of somatic mutations in cancer 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell graph neural networks enable the digital staging of tumor microenvironment and precise prediction of patient survival in gastric cancer 93%
- Generalizing AI-driven Assessment of Immunohistochemistry across Immunostains and Cancer Types: A Universal Immunohistochemistry Analyzer 92%
- Deep learning inference of cell type-specific gene expression from breast tumor histopathology 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.