Back

BioSignal Copilot: Leveraging the power of LLMs in drafting reports for biomedical signals

Liu, C.; Ma, Y.; Kothur, K.; Nikpour, A.; Kavehei, O.

2023-07-06 health informatics
10.1101/2023.06.28.23291916
Show abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in various domains, particularly in processing text-based data. However, their applicability to biomedical time-series signals (e.g. electrograms) remains largely unexplored due to the lack of a signal-to-text (sequence) engine to harness the power of LLMs. The application of biosignals has been growing due to the improvements in the reliability, noise and performance of front-end sensing, and back-end signal processing, despite lowering the number of sensing components (e.g. electrodes) needed for effective and long-term use (e.g. in wearable or implantable devices). One of the most reliable techniques used in clinical settings is producing a technical/clinical report on the quality and features of collected data and using that alongside a set of auxiliary or complementary data (e.g. imaging, blood tests, medical records). This work addresses the missing puzzle in implementing conversational artificial intelligence (AI), a reliable, technical and clinically relevant signal-to-text (Sig2Txt) engine. While medical foundation models can be expected, reports of Sig2Txt engine in large scale can be utilised in years to come to develop foundational models for a unified purpose. In this work, we propose a system (SignalGPT or BioSignal Copilot) that reduces medical signals to a freestyle or formatted clinical, technical report close to a brief clinical report capturing key features and characterisation of input signal. In its ideal form, this system provides the tool necessary to produce the technical input sequence necessary for LLMs as a step toward using AI in the medical and clinical domains as an assistant to clinicians and patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first system for bioSig2Txt generation, and the idea can be used in other domains as well to produce technical reports to harness the power of LLMs. This method also improves the interpretability and tracking (history) of information into and out of the AI models. We did implement this aspect through a buffer in our system. As a preliminary step, we verify the feasibility of the BioSignal Copilot (SignalGPT) using a clinical ECG dataset to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed system. In this feasibility study, we used prompts and fine-tuning to prevent fluctuations in response. The combination of biosignal processing and natural language processing offers a promising solution that improves the interpretability of the results obtained from AI, which also leverages the rapid growth of LLMs.

Matching journals

1
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 14 published papers
#1
97× avg
2
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
3
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 37 published papers
Top 1.0%
28× avg
4
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 2%
19× avg
5
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 0.5%
28× avg
6
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 68%
5.0%
7
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 36%
5.0%
8
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
51× avg
9
JAMIA Open
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 35 published papers
Top 3%
9.7× avg
10
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 53 published papers
Top 4%
6.3× avg
12
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 8%
2.8× avg
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
14
Patterns
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.9%
23× avg
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
17
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
18
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 4%
7.3× avg
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 5%
4.5× avg
20
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 10%
2.2× avg
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.9%
20× avg
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
24
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
8.6× avg
25
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 4%
5.7× avg
26
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 6%
3.1× avg
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 41 published papers
Top 4%
5.6× avg
28
Heliyon
Elsevier BV · based on 57 published papers
Top 14%
1.7× avg
29
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
6.0× avg