Back

Disentangling the biotic and abiotic drivers of bird-building collisions in a tropical Asian city using ecological niche modelling.

Tan, D. J.; Freymueller, N.; Teo, K. M.; Symes, W. S.; Lum, S. K.; Rheindt, F. E.

2023-06-30 ecology
10.1101/2023.06.27.546782 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bird-building collisions are responsible for a large number of bird deaths in cities around the world, yet they remain poorly studied outside of North America. This study presents one of the first city-wide fine-scale and landscape-scale analyses of bird-building collisions from Asia and represents a novel application of maximum entropy modeling (as commonly applied to species distribution modeling) to assess the drivers of bird-building collisions in the tropical city-state of Singapore. Our results show that the drivers of bird-building collisions often vary among taxa, with several migratory taxa having a higher relative collision risk linked to areas with high building densities and high levels of nocturnal blue light pollution. In contrast, non-migratory taxa had a higher collision risk in areas proximate to woodland cover. Projecting these models onto high-fidelity long-term government land-use plans, we demonstrate that our approach can be applied to predict future changes in bird-building collision risk stemming from future increases in blue light pollution and encroachment of buildings into forested areas. Our results suggest that bird-building collision mitigation measures need to account for the differential drivers of collision across both resident and migratory species, and show that combining community science and ecological modeling can be a powerful approach for analyzing bird-building collision data. Article impact statementInferring the drivers and distribution patterns of bird-building collision hotspots in Singapore using community science and maximum entropy modeling

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.