Cell Type- and Tissue-specific Enhancers in Craniofacial Development
Rajderkar, S. S.; Paraiso, K.; Amaral, M. L.; Kosicki, M.; Cook, L.; Darbellay, F.; Spurrell, C.; Osterwalder, M.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, H.; Afzal, S. Y.; Blow, M.; Kelman, G.; Barozzi, I.; Fukuda-Yuzawa, Y.; Akiyama, J. A.; Afzal, V.; Tran, S.; Plajzer-Frick, I.; Novak, C. S.; Kato, M.; Hunter, R. D.; von Maydell, K.; Wang, A.; Lin, L.; Preissl, S.; Lisgo, S.; Ren, B.; Dickel, D. E.; Pennacchio, L. A.; Visel, A.
Show abstract
The genetic basis of craniofacial birth defects and general variation in human facial shape remains poorly understood. Distant-acting transcriptional enhancers are a major category of non-coding genome function and have been shown to control the fine-tuned spatiotemporal expression of genes during critical stages of craniofacial development1-3. However, a lack of accurate maps of the genomic location and cell type-specific in vivo activities of all craniofacial enhancers prevents their systematic exploration in human genetics studies. Here, we combined histone modification and chromatin accessibility profiling from different stages of human craniofacial development with single-cell analyses of the developing mouse face to create a comprehensive catalogue of the regulatory landscape of facial development at tissue- and single cell-resolution. In total, we identified approximately 14,000 enhancers across seven developmental stages from weeks 4 through 8 of human embryonic face development. We used transgenic mouse reporter assays to determine the in vivo activity patterns of human face enhancers predicted from these data. Across 16 in vivo validated human enhancers, we observed a rich diversity of craniofacial subregions in which these enhancers are active in vivo. To annotate the cell type specificities of human-mouse conserved enhancers, we performed single-cell RNA-seq and single-nucleus ATAC-seq of mouse craniofacial tissues from embryonic days e11.5 to e15.5. By integrating these data across species, we find that the majority (56%) of human craniofacial enhancers are functionally conserved in mice, providing cell type- and embryonic stage-resolved predictions of their in vivo activity profiles. Using retrospective analysis of known craniofacial enhancers in combination with single cell-resolved transgenic reporter assays, we demonstrate the utility of these data for predicting the in vivo cell type specificity of enhancers. Taken together, our data provide an expansive resource for genetic and developmental studies of human craniofacial development. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=138 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/546603v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7595a9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b48b81org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@32fe86org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e41fed_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genes Affecting Vocal and Facial Anatomy Went Through Extensive Regulatory Divergence in Modern Humans 97%
- TAD Evolutionary and functional characterization reveals diversity in mammalian TAD boundary properties and function 97%
- A cell type-aware framework for nominating non-coding variants in Mendelian regulatory disorders 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of zebrafish periderm enhancers facilitates identification of a regulatory variant near human KRT8/18 97%
- linc-mipep and linc-wrb encode micropeptides that regulate chromatin accessibility in vertebrate-specific neural cells 96%
- MicroRNA-eQTLs in the developing human neocortex link miR-4707-3p expression to brain size 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.