Cortical over-representation of phonetic onsets of ignored speech in hearing impaired individuals
Carta, S.; Alickovic, E.; Zaar, J.; Lopez Valdes, A.; Di Liberto, G.
Show abstract
Hearing impairment alters the sound input received by the human auditory system, reducing speech comprehension in noisy multi-talker auditory scenes. Despite such challenges, attentional modulation on the envelope tracking in multi-talker scenarios is comparable between normal hearing (NH) and hearing impaired (HI) participants, with previous research suggesting an over-representation of the speech envelopes in HI individuals (see, e.g., Fuglsang et al. 2020 and Presacco et al. 2019), even though HI participants reported difficulties in performing the task. This result raises an important question: What speech-processing stage could reflect the difficulty in attentional selection, if not envelope tracking? Here, we use scalp electroencephalography (EEG) to test the hypothesis that such difficulties are underpinned by an over-representation of phonological-level information of the ignored speech sounds. To do so, we carried out a re-analysis of an EEG dataset where EEG signals were recorded as HI participants fitted with hearing aids attended to one speaker (target) while ignoring a competing speaker (masker) and spatialised multi-talker background noise. Multivariate temporal response function analyses revealed that EEG signals reflect stronger phonetic-feature encoding for target than masker speech streams. Interestingly, robust EEG encoding of phoneme onsets emerged for both target and masker streams, in contrast with previous work on NH participants and in line with our hypothesis of an over-representation of the masker. Stronger phoneme-onset encoding emerged for the masker, pointing to a possible neural basis for the higher distractibility experienced by HI individuals. Significance StatementThis study investigated the neural underpinnings of attentional selection in multi-talker scenarios in hearing-impaired participants. The impact of attentional selection on phonological encoding was assessed with electroencephalography (EEG) in an immersive multi-talker scenario. EEG signals encoded the phonetic features of the target (attended) speech more strongly than those of the masker (ignored) speech; but interestingly, they encoded the phoneme onsets of both target and masker speech. This suggests that the cortex of hearing-impaired individuals may over-represent higher-level features of ignored speech sounds, which could contribute to their higher distractibility in noisy environments. These findings provide insight into the neural mechanisms underlying speech comprehension in hearing-impaired individuals and could inform the development of novel approaches to improve speech perception in noisy environments.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Delta/theta band EEG differentially tracks low and high frequency speech-derived envelopes 98%
- The integration of continuous audio and visual speech in a cocktail-party environment depends on attention 97%
- Cross-modal interactions at the audiovisual cocktail-party revealed by behavior, ERPs, and neural oscillations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Previously Encountered Sensory Information on Neural Representations of Predictability: Evidence from Human EEG 97%
- Neural tracking of the speech envelope predicts binaural unmasking 97%
- Degradation levels of continuous speech affect neural speech tracking and alpha power differently 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural speech tracking benefit of lip movements predicts behavioral deterioration when the speaker's mouth is occluded 97%
- Neural Speech-Tracking During Selective Attention: A spatially realistic audiovisual study 97%
- Sensory and perceptual decisional processes underlying the perception of reverberant auditory environments 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.