Back

Uncovering Ghost Introgression Through Genomic Analysis of a Distinct East Asian Hickory Species

Zhang, W.-P.; Ding, Y.-M.; Cao, Y.; Li, P.; Yang, Y.; Pang, X.-X.; Bai, W.-N.; Zhang, D.-Y.

2023-06-27 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.06.26.546421 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although the possibility of introgression from ghost lineages (all unsampled extant and extinct taxa) is now widely recognized, detecting and characterizing ghost introgression remains a challenge. Here, we propose a combined use of the popular D-statistic method, which tests for the presence of introgression, and the full-likelihood method BPP, which determines which of the possible gene-flow scenarios, including ghost introgression, is truly responsible. We illustrate the utility of this approach by investigating the reticulation and bifurcation history of the genus Carya (Juglandaceae), including the beaked hickory Carya sinensis. To achieve this goal, we generated two chromosome-level reference genomes respectively for C. sinensis and C. cathayensis. Furthermore, we re-sequenced the whole genomes of 43 individuals from C. sinensis and one individual from each of the 11 diploid species of Carya. The latter dataset with one individual per species is used to reconstruct the phylogenetic networks and estimate the divergence time of Carya. Our results unambiguously demonstrate the presence of ghost introgression from an extinct lineage into the beaked hickory, dispelling certain misconceptions about the phylogenetic history of C. sinensis. We also discuss the profound implications of ghost introgression into C. sinensis for the historical biogeography of hickory species. [BPP; Carya; D-statistic; gene flow; ghost introgression]

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
3
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.8%
5
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
11
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
13
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
14
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
15
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
20
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
27
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
29
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
30
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%