Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize Brain Network Dynamics in Epilepsy
Upadhyaya, D. P.; Prantzalos, K.; Thyagaraj, S.; Shafiabadi, N.; Fernandez-BacaVaca, G.; Sivagnanam, S.; Majumdar, A.; Sahoo, S. S.
Show abstract
The rapid adoption of machine learning (ML) algorithms in a wide range of biomedical applications has highlighted issues of trust and the lack of understanding regarding the results generated by ML algorithms. Recent studies have focused on developing interpretable ML models and establish guidelines for transparency and ethical use, ensuring the responsible integration of machine learning in healthcare. In this study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of ML interpretability methods to provide important insights into the dynamics of brain network interactions in epilepsy, a serious neurological disorder affecting more than 60 million persons worldwide. Using high-resolution intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings from a cohort of 16 patients, we developed high accuracy ML models to categorize these brain activity recordings into either seizure or non-seizure classes followed by a more complex task of delineating the different stages of seizure progression to different parts of the brain as a multi-class classification task. We applied three distinct types of interpretability methods to the high-accuracy ML models to gain an understanding of the relative contributions of different categories of brain interaction patterns, including multi-focii interactions, which play an important role in distinguishing between different states of the brain. The results of this study demonstrate for the first time that post-hoc interpretability methods enable us to understand why ML algorithms generate a given set of results and how variations in value of input values affect the accuracy of the ML algorithms. In particular, we show in this study that interpretability methods can be used to identify brain regions and interaction patterns that have a significant impact on seizure events. The results of this study highlight the importance of the integrated implementation of ML algorithms together with interpretability methods in aberrant brain network studies and the wider domain of biomedical research.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 94%
- Longitudinally Tracking Personal Physiomes for Precision Management of Childhood Epilepsy 93%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuronal Spike Shapes (NSS): A Straightforward Approach to Investigate Heterogeneity in Neuronal Excitability States. 94%
- A machine-learning Approach for Stress Detection Using Wearable Sensors in Free-living Environments 94%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring Connectivity in Linear Multivariate Processes with Penalized Regression Techniques 95%
- HeartNet: Self Multi-Head Attention Mechanism via Convolutional Network with Adversarial Data Synthesis for ECG-based Arrhythmia Classification 94%
- SleepSatelightFTC: A Lightweight and Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Single-Channel EEG-Based Sleep Stage Classification 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.