Back

Is HDL-c plasma concentration a possible marker of HIV replication? A cross-sectional analysis in untreated HIV-infected individuals accessing HIV care in Italy

Piconi, S.; Bottanelli, M.; Marchetti, G.; Gori, A.; Castagna, A.; Cicalini, S.; Squillace, N.; Cozzi Lepri, A.; Orofino, G.; Ceccherini Silbertein, F.; Di Biagio, A.; D'Arminio Monforte, A.

2023-06-28 immunology
10.1101/2023.06.23.546265 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimsHIV infection is associated with dyslipidemia and an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. HIV Nef protein downregulates the generation of nascent HDL. The interplay between HIV-RNA, HDL-c level and CD4/CD8 ratio in naive HIV patients remains to be elucidated. MethodsWe included untreated persons living with HIV (PLWH) of the ICONA Foundation Study cohort if they also had [&ge;]2 viral load (VL) measurements prior to ART initiation. We performed unadjusted correlation and linear regression analyses evaluating the effect of VLset on HDL-C. Vlset and CD4/CD8 ratio were fit in the log10 scale, while HDL-c, was fitted in the untransformed raw scale. ResultsWe included 3,980 untreated PLWH. Fifty-eighty (1.5%) were aviremic. We observed a negative correlation between HDL-c and VLset (Pearson R2=0.03), from fitting an unadjusted linear regression model -8.5 mg/dl (95% CI: -15,9 --0,84 p<0.03). There was a dose-response relationship between HDL-c levels and VLset, however, this association was somewhat attenuated after further controlling for gender. Despite a positive correlation between HDL-c and CD4/CD8 ratio, the HDL-c plasma concentration does not satisfy the criteria for a strong surrogate marker. ConclusionsOur data show that HDL-c plasma concentration is significantly lower per higher level of VLSet although this was in part explained by gender. Further analyses should be promoted to better understand the molecular mechanisms that underline the relationship between HIV replication, HDL-c formation, and diseases progression.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
5
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
7
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
8
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
11
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%