Back

Type IV-A3 CRISPR-Cas systems drive inter-plasmid conflicts by acquiring spacers in trans

Benz, F.; Camara-Wilpert, S.; Russel, J.; Wandera, K. G.; Cepaite, R.; Ares-Arroyo, M.; Gomes-Filho, J. V.; Englert, F.; Kuehn, J.; Gloor, S.; Cuenod, A.; Aguila-Sans, M.; Maccario, L.; Egli, A.; Randau, L.; Pausch, P.; Rocha, E.; Beisel, C. L.; Madsen, J. S.; Bikard, D.; Hall, A. R.; Soerensen, S. J.; Pinilla-Redondo, R.

2023-06-23 microbiology
10.1101/2023.06.23.546257 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Type IV-A CRISPR-Cas systems are primarily encoded on plasmids and form multi-subunit ribonucleoprotein complexes with unknown biological functions. In contrast to other CRISPR-Cas types, they lack the archetypical CRISPR acquisition module and encode a DinG helicase instead of a nuclease component. Type IV-A3 systems are carried by large conjugative plasmids that often harbor multiple antibiotic-resistance genes. Although their CRISPR array contents suggest a role in inter-plasmid conflicts, this function and the underlying mechanisms have remained unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that a plasmid-encoded type IV-A3 CRISPR-Cas system co-opts the type I-E adaptation machinery from its clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae host to update its CRISPR array. Furthermore, we demonstrate that robust interference of conjugative plasmids and phages is elicited through CRISPR RNA-dependent transcriptional repression. By targeting plasmid core functions, type IV-A3 can prevent the uptake of incoming plasmids, limit their horizontal transfer, and destabilize co-residing plasmids, altogether supporting type IV-A3s involvement in plasmid competition. Collectively, our findings shed light on the molecular mechanisms and ecological function of type IV-A3 systems and have broad implications for understanding and countering the spread of antibiotic resistance in clinically relevant strains.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.