Back

Preclinical and Human Phase 1 Studies of Aerosolized Hydroxychloroquine: Implications for Antiviral COVID-19 Therapy

Bentur, O. S.; Hutt, R.; Brassil, D.; Krieger, A. C.; Backman, P.; Charous, B. L.; Boushey, H.; Gonda, I.; Coller, B. S.; MacArthur, R. B.

2023-07-01 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2023.06.22.23291702 medRxiv
Show abstract

Based on early reports of the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine sulfate (HCQS) to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 viral replication in vitro, and since severe pulmonary involvement is the major cause of COVID-19 mortality, we assessed the safety and efficacy of aerosolized HCQS (aHCQS) therapy in animals and humans. In a Phase 1 study of aHCQS in healthy volunteers, doses up to 50 mg were well tolerated and estimated epithelial lining fluid concentrations immediately after inhalation (>2,000 M) exceeded the in vitro concentrations needed for suppression of viral replication ([&ge;]119 M). A study in rats comparing HCQS solution administered orally (13.3 mg/kg) and by intratracheal installation (IT 0.18 mg/kg, <5% of oral dose) demonstrated that at 2 minutes, IT administration was associated with 5X higher mean hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) concentrations in the lung (IT: 49.5 {+/-} 6.5 {micro}g HCQ/g tissue, oral: 9.9 {+/-} 3.4; p<0.01). A subsequent study of IT and intranasal HCQS in the Syrian hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, failed to show clinical benefit. We conclude that aHCQS alone is unlikely to be effective for COVID-19, but based on our aHCQS pharmacokinetics and current viral entry data, adding oral HCQS to aHCQS, along with a transmembrane protease inhibitor, may improve efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.